4.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tetsuo Handa penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
commit ebec3f8f5271139df618ebdf8427e24ba102ba94 upstream.
syzbot is reporting stalls at __process_echoes() [1]. This is because since ldata->echo_commit < ldata->echo_tail becomes true for some reason, the discard loop is serving as almost infinite loop. This patch tries to avoid falling into ldata->echo_commit < ldata->echo_tail situation by making access to echo_* variables more carefully.
Since reset_buffer_flags() is called without output_lock held, it should not touch echo_* variables. And omit a call to reset_buffer_flags() from n_tty_open() by using vzalloc().
Since add_echo_byte() is called without output_lock held, it needs memory barrier between storing into echo_buf[] and incrementing echo_head counter. echo_buf() needs corresponding memory barrier before reading echo_buf[]. Lack of handling the possibility of not-yet-stored multi-byte operation might be the reason of falling into ldata->echo_commit < ldata->echo_tail situation, for if I do WARN_ON(ldata->echo_commit == tail + 1) prior to echo_buf(ldata, tail + 1), the WARN_ON() fires.
Also, explicitly masking with buffer for the former "while" loop, and use ldata->echo_commit > tail for the latter "while" loop.
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=17f23b094cd80df750e5b0f8982c521ee6bcbf4...
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Reported-by: syzbot syzbot+108696293d7a21ab688f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Cc: Peter Hurley peter@hurleysoftware.com Cc: stable stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c index b279f8730e04..431742201709 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c +++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static inline unsigned char *read_buf_addr(struct n_tty_data *ldata, size_t i)
static inline unsigned char echo_buf(struct n_tty_data *ldata, size_t i) { + smp_rmb(); /* Matches smp_wmb() in add_echo_byte(). */ return ldata->echo_buf[i & (N_TTY_BUF_SIZE - 1)]; }
@@ -318,9 +319,7 @@ static inline void put_tty_queue(unsigned char c, struct n_tty_data *ldata) static void reset_buffer_flags(struct n_tty_data *ldata) { ldata->read_head = ldata->canon_head = ldata->read_tail = 0; - ldata->echo_head = ldata->echo_tail = ldata->echo_commit = 0; ldata->commit_head = 0; - ldata->echo_mark = 0; ldata->line_start = 0;
ldata->erasing = 0; @@ -619,12 +618,19 @@ static size_t __process_echoes(struct tty_struct *tty) old_space = space = tty_write_room(tty);
tail = ldata->echo_tail; - while (ldata->echo_commit != tail) { + while (MASK(ldata->echo_commit) != MASK(tail)) { c = echo_buf(ldata, tail); if (c == ECHO_OP_START) { unsigned char op; int no_space_left = 0;
+ /* + * Since add_echo_byte() is called without holding + * output_lock, we might see only portion of multi-byte + * operation. + */ + if (MASK(ldata->echo_commit) == MASK(tail + 1)) + goto not_yet_stored; /* * If the buffer byte is the start of a multi-byte * operation, get the next byte, which is either the @@ -636,6 +642,8 @@ static size_t __process_echoes(struct tty_struct *tty) unsigned int num_chars, num_bs;
case ECHO_OP_ERASE_TAB: + if (MASK(ldata->echo_commit) == MASK(tail + 2)) + goto not_yet_stored; num_chars = echo_buf(ldata, tail + 2);
/* @@ -730,7 +738,8 @@ static size_t __process_echoes(struct tty_struct *tty) /* If the echo buffer is nearly full (so that the possibility exists * of echo overrun before the next commit), then discard enough * data at the tail to prevent a subsequent overrun */ - while (ldata->echo_commit - tail >= ECHO_DISCARD_WATERMARK) { + while (ldata->echo_commit > tail && + ldata->echo_commit - tail >= ECHO_DISCARD_WATERMARK) { if (echo_buf(ldata, tail) == ECHO_OP_START) { if (echo_buf(ldata, tail + 1) == ECHO_OP_ERASE_TAB) tail += 3; @@ -740,6 +749,7 @@ static size_t __process_echoes(struct tty_struct *tty) tail++; }
+ not_yet_stored: ldata->echo_tail = tail; return old_space - space; } @@ -750,6 +760,7 @@ static void commit_echoes(struct tty_struct *tty) size_t nr, old, echoed; size_t head;
+ mutex_lock(&ldata->output_lock); head = ldata->echo_head; ldata->echo_mark = head; old = ldata->echo_commit - ldata->echo_tail; @@ -758,10 +769,12 @@ static void commit_echoes(struct tty_struct *tty) * is over the threshold (and try again each time another * block is accumulated) */ nr = head - ldata->echo_tail; - if (nr < ECHO_COMMIT_WATERMARK || (nr % ECHO_BLOCK > old % ECHO_BLOCK)) + if (nr < ECHO_COMMIT_WATERMARK || + (nr % ECHO_BLOCK > old % ECHO_BLOCK)) { + mutex_unlock(&ldata->output_lock); return; + }
- mutex_lock(&ldata->output_lock); ldata->echo_commit = head; echoed = __process_echoes(tty); mutex_unlock(&ldata->output_lock); @@ -812,7 +825,9 @@ static void flush_echoes(struct tty_struct *tty)
static inline void add_echo_byte(unsigned char c, struct n_tty_data *ldata) { - *echo_buf_addr(ldata, ldata->echo_head++) = c; + *echo_buf_addr(ldata, ldata->echo_head) = c; + smp_wmb(); /* Matches smp_rmb() in echo_buf(). */ + ldata->echo_head++; }
/** @@ -1881,30 +1896,21 @@ static int n_tty_open(struct tty_struct *tty) struct n_tty_data *ldata;
/* Currently a malloc failure here can panic */ - ldata = vmalloc(sizeof(*ldata)); + ldata = vzalloc(sizeof(*ldata)); if (!ldata) - goto err; + return -ENOMEM;
ldata->overrun_time = jiffies; mutex_init(&ldata->atomic_read_lock); mutex_init(&ldata->output_lock);
tty->disc_data = ldata; - reset_buffer_flags(tty->disc_data); - ldata->column = 0; - ldata->canon_column = 0; - ldata->num_overrun = 0; - ldata->no_room = 0; - ldata->lnext = 0; tty->closing = 0; /* indicate buffer work may resume */ clear_bit(TTY_LDISC_HALTED, &tty->flags); n_tty_set_termios(tty, NULL); tty_unthrottle(tty); - return 0; -err: - return -ENOMEM; }
static inline int input_available_p(struct tty_struct *tty, int poll)