4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Boris Brezillon bbrezillon@kernel.org
commit 13c15e07eedf26092054c8c71f2f47edb8388310 upstream.
Looks like PROGRAM LOAD (AKA write cache) does not necessarily reset the cache content to 0xFF (depends on vendor implementation), so we must fill the page cache entirely even if we only want to program the data portion of the page, otherwise we might corrupt the BBM or user data previously programmed in OOB area.
Fixes: 7529df465248 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to support SPI NANDs") Reported-by: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon bbrezillon@kernel.org Tested-by: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de Acked-by: Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c @@ -304,24 +304,30 @@ static int spinand_write_to_cache_op(str struct nand_device *nand = spinand_to_nand(spinand); struct mtd_info *mtd = nanddev_to_mtd(nand); struct nand_page_io_req adjreq = *req; - unsigned int nbytes = 0; - void *buf = NULL; + void *buf = spinand->databuf; + unsigned int nbytes; u16 column = 0; int ret;
- memset(spinand->databuf, 0xff, - nanddev_page_size(nand) + - nanddev_per_page_oobsize(nand)); + /* + * Looks like PROGRAM LOAD (AKA write cache) does not necessarily reset + * the cache content to 0xFF (depends on vendor implementation), so we + * must fill the page cache entirely even if we only want to program + * the data portion of the page, otherwise we might corrupt the BBM or + * user data previously programmed in OOB area. + */ + nbytes = nanddev_page_size(nand) + nanddev_per_page_oobsize(nand); + memset(spinand->databuf, 0xff, nbytes); + adjreq.dataoffs = 0; + adjreq.datalen = nanddev_page_size(nand); + adjreq.databuf.out = spinand->databuf; + adjreq.ooblen = nanddev_per_page_oobsize(nand); + adjreq.ooboffs = 0; + adjreq.oobbuf.out = spinand->oobbuf;
- if (req->datalen) { + if (req->datalen) memcpy(spinand->databuf + req->dataoffs, req->databuf.out, req->datalen); - adjreq.dataoffs = 0; - adjreq.datalen = nanddev_page_size(nand); - adjreq.databuf.out = spinand->databuf; - nbytes = adjreq.datalen; - buf = spinand->databuf; - }
if (req->ooblen) { if (req->mode == MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB) @@ -332,14 +338,6 @@ static int spinand_write_to_cache_op(str else memcpy(spinand->oobbuf + req->ooboffs, req->oobbuf.out, req->ooblen); - - adjreq.ooblen = nanddev_per_page_oobsize(nand); - adjreq.ooboffs = 0; - nbytes += nanddev_per_page_oobsize(nand); - if (!buf) { - buf = spinand->oobbuf; - column = nanddev_page_size(nand); - } }
spinand_cache_op_adjust_colum(spinand, &adjreq, &column); @@ -370,8 +368,8 @@ static int spinand_write_to_cache_op(str
/* * We need to use the RANDOM LOAD CACHE operation if there's - * more than one iteration, because the LOAD operation resets - * the cache to 0xff. + * more than one iteration, because the LOAD operation might + * reset the cache to 0xff. */ if (nbytes) { column = op.addr.val;