5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tony Luck tony.luck@intel.com
commit 2eda374e883ad297bd9fe575a16c1dc850346075 upstream.
New CPU #defines encode vendor and family as well as model.
[ dhansen: vertically align 0's in invlpg_miss_ids[] ]
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck tony.luck@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen dave.hansen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) bp@alien8.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240424181518.41946-1-tony.luck%40intel.com [ Ricardo: I used the old match macro X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL() instead of X86_MATCH_VFM() as in the upstream commit. I also kept the ALDERLAKE_N name instead of ATOM_GRACEMONT. Both refer to the same CPU model. ] Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/x86/mm/init.c | 16 ++++++---------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c @@ -257,21 +257,17 @@ static void __init probe_page_size_mask( } }
-#define INTEL_MATCH(_model) { .vendor = X86_VENDOR_INTEL, \ - .family = 6, \ - .model = _model, \ - } /* * INVLPG may not properly flush Global entries * on these CPUs when PCIDs are enabled. */ static const struct x86_cpu_id invlpg_miss_ids[] = { - INTEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_ALDERLAKE ), - INTEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_ALDERLAKE_L ), - INTEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_ALDERLAKE_N ), - INTEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE ), - INTEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_P), - INTEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S), + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE, 0), + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_L, 0), + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_N, 0), + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE, 0), + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_P, 0), + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, 0), {} };