On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 03:33:55PM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 4d8df8cbb9156b0a0ab3f802b80cb5db57acc0bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anthony Steinhauser asteinhauser@google.com Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 05:44:19 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] x86/speculation: PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE enforcement for indirect branches.
Currently, it is possible to enable indirect branch speculation even after it was force-disabled using the PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE option. Moreover, the PR_GET_SPECULATION_CTRL command gives afterwards an incorrect result (force-disabled when it is in fact enabled). This also is inconsistent vs. STIBP and the documention which cleary states that PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE cannot be undone.
Fix this by actually enforcing force-disabled indirect branch speculation. PR_SPEC_ENABLE called after PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE now fails with -EPERM as described in the documentation.
Fixes: 9137bb27e60e ("x86/speculation: Add prctl() control for indirect branch speculation") Signed-off-by: Anthony Steinhauser asteinhauser@google.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This patch now applies fine to all branches after we resolved the issues with the other IPBP patch.