From: Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com
[ Upstream commit edbdb43fc96b11b3bfa531be306a1993d9fe89ec ]
Preserve TDP MMU roots until they are explicitly invalidated by gifting the TDP MMU itself a reference to a root when it is allocated. Keeping a reference in the TDP MMU fixes a flaw where the TDP MMU exhibits terrible performance, and can potentially even soft-hang a vCPU, if a vCPU frequently unloads its roots, e.g. when KVM is emulating SMI+RSM.
When KVM emulates something that invalidates _all_ TLB entries, e.g. SMI and RSM, KVM unloads all of the vCPUs roots (KVM keeps a small per-vCPU cache of previous roots). Unloading roots is a simple way to ensure KVM flushes and synchronizes all roots for the vCPU, as KVM flushes and syncs when allocating a "new" root (from the vCPU's perspective).
In the shadow MMU, KVM keeps track of all shadow pages, roots included, in a per-VM hash table. Unloading a shadow MMU root just wipes it from the per-vCPU cache; the root is still tracked in the per-VM hash table. When KVM loads a "new" root for the vCPU, KVM will find the old, unloaded root in the per-VM hash table.
Unlike the shadow MMU, the TDP MMU doesn't track "inactive" roots in a per-VM structure, where "active" in this case means a root is either in-use or cached as a previous root by at least one vCPU. When a TDP MMU root becomes inactive, i.e. the last vCPU reference to the root is put, KVM immediately frees the root (asterisk on "immediately" as the actual freeing may be done by a worker, but for all intents and purposes the root is gone).
The TDP MMU behavior is especially problematic for 1-vCPU setups, as unloading all roots effectively frees all roots. The issue is mitigated to some degree in multi-vCPU setups as a different vCPU usually holds a reference to an unloaded root and thus keeps the root alive, allowing the vCPU to reuse its old root after unloading (with a flush+sync).
The TDP MMU flaw has been known for some time, as until very recently, KVM's handling of CR0.WP also triggered unloading of all roots. The CR0.WP toggling scenario was eventually addressed by not unloading roots when _only_ CR0.WP is toggled, but such an approach doesn't Just Work for emulating SMM as KVM must emulate a full TLB flush on entry and exit to/from SMM. Given that the shadow MMU plays nice with unloading roots at will, teaching the TDP MMU to do the same is far less complex than modifying KVM to track which roots need to be flushed before reuse.
Note, preserving all possible TDP MMU roots is not a concern with respect to memory consumption. Now that the role for direct MMUs doesn't include information about the guest, e.g. CR0.PG, CR0.WP, CR4.SMEP, etc., there are _at most_ six possible roots (where "guest_mode" here means L2):
1. 4-level !SMM !guest_mode 2. 4-level SMM !guest_mode 3. 5-level !SMM !guest_mode 4. 5-level SMM !guest_mode 5. 4-level !SMM guest_mode 6. 5-level !SMM guest_mode
And because each vCPU can track 4 valid roots, a VM can already have all 6 root combinations live at any given time. Not to mention that, in practice, no sane VMM will advertise different guest.MAXPHYADDR values across vCPUs, i.e. KVM won't ever use both 4-level and 5-level roots for a single VM. Furthermore, the vast majority of modern hypervisors will utilize EPT/NPT when available, thus the guest_mode=%true cases are also unlikely to be utilized.
Reported-by: Jeremi Piotrowski jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/959c5bce-beb5-b463-7158-33fc4a4f910c@linux.micro... Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220209170020.1775368-1-pbonzini%40redhat.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230322013731.102955-1-minipli@grsecurity.net Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000a0bc2b05f9dd7fab@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000eca0b905fa0f7756@google.com Cc: Ben Gardon bgardon@google.com Cc: David Matlack dmatlack@google.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: Jeremi Piotrowski jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230426220323.3079789-1-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c index cc1fb9a656201..c649a333792b8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c @@ -39,7 +39,17 @@ static __always_inline bool kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(struct kvm *kvm,
void kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm) { - /* Also waits for any queued work items. */ + /* + * Invalidate all roots, which besides the obvious, schedules all roots + * for zapping and thus puts the TDP MMU's reference to each root, i.e. + * ultimately frees all roots. + */ + kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(kvm); + + /* + * Destroying a workqueue also first flushes the workqueue, i.e. no + * need to invoke kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots(). + */ destroy_workqueue(kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_zap_wq);
WARN_ON(atomic64_read(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages)); @@ -115,16 +125,6 @@ static void tdp_mmu_schedule_zap_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root queue_work(kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_zap_wq, &root->tdp_mmu_async_work); }
-static inline bool kvm_tdp_root_mark_invalid(struct kvm_mmu_page *page) -{ - union kvm_mmu_page_role role = page->role; - role.invalid = true; - - /* No need to use cmpxchg, only the invalid bit can change. */ - role.word = xchg(&page->role.word, role.word); - return role.invalid; -} - void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root, bool shared) { @@ -133,45 +133,12 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root, if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count)) return;
- WARN_ON(!is_tdp_mmu_page(root)); - /* - * The root now has refcount=0. It is valid, but readers already - * cannot acquire a reference to it because kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root() - * rejects it. This remains true for the rest of the execution - * of this function, because readers visit valid roots only - * (except for tdp_mmu_zap_root_work(), which however - * does not acquire any reference itself). - * - * Even though there are flows that need to visit all roots for - * correctness, they all take mmu_lock for write, so they cannot yet - * run concurrently. The same is true after kvm_tdp_root_mark_invalid, - * since the root still has refcount=0. - * - * However, tdp_mmu_zap_root can yield, and writers do not expect to - * see refcount=0 (see for example kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots()). - * So the root temporarily gets an extra reference, going to refcount=1 - * while staying invalid. Readers still cannot acquire any reference; - * but writers are now allowed to run if tdp_mmu_zap_root yields and - * they might take an extra reference if they themselves yield. - * Therefore, when the reference is given back by the worker, - * there is no guarantee that the refcount is still 1. If not, whoever - * puts the last reference will free the page, but they will not have to - * zap the root because a root cannot go from invalid to valid. + * The TDP MMU itself holds a reference to each root until the root is + * explicitly invalidated, i.e. the final reference should be never be + * put for a valid root. */ - if (!kvm_tdp_root_mark_invalid(root)) { - refcount_set(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count, 1); - - /* - * Zapping the root in a worker is not just "nice to have"; - * it is required because kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots() - * skips already-invalid roots. If kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root() did - * not add the root to the workqueue, kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all_fast() - * might return with some roots not zapped yet. - */ - tdp_mmu_schedule_zap_root(kvm, root); - return; - } + KVM_BUG_ON(!is_tdp_mmu_page(root) || !root->role.invalid, kvm);
spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock); list_del_rcu(&root->link); @@ -319,7 +286,14 @@ hpa_t kvm_tdp_mmu_get_vcpu_root_hpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) root = tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(vcpu); tdp_mmu_init_sp(root, NULL, 0, role);
- refcount_set(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count, 1); + /* + * TDP MMU roots are kept until they are explicitly invalidated, either + * by a memslot update or by the destruction of the VM. Initialize the + * refcount to two; one reference for the vCPU, and one reference for + * the TDP MMU itself, which is held until the root is invalidated and + * is ultimately put by tdp_mmu_zap_root_work(). + */ + refcount_set(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count, 2);
spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock); list_add_rcu(&root->link, &kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots); @@ -1022,32 +996,49 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots(struct kvm *kvm) /* * Mark each TDP MMU root as invalid to prevent vCPUs from reusing a root that * is about to be zapped, e.g. in response to a memslots update. The actual - * zapping is performed asynchronously, so a reference is taken on all roots. - * Using a separate workqueue makes it easy to ensure that the destruction is - * performed before the "fast zap" completes, without keeping a separate list - * of invalidated roots; the list is effectively the list of work items in - * the workqueue. - * - * Get a reference even if the root is already invalid, the asynchronous worker - * assumes it was gifted a reference to the root it processes. Because mmu_lock - * is held for write, it should be impossible to observe a root with zero refcount, - * i.e. the list of roots cannot be stale. + * zapping is performed asynchronously. Using a separate workqueue makes it + * easy to ensure that the destruction is performed before the "fast zap" + * completes, without keeping a separate list of invalidated roots; the list is + * effectively the list of work items in the workqueue. * - * This has essentially the same effect for the TDP MMU - * as updating mmu_valid_gen does for the shadow MMU. + * Note, the asynchronous worker is gifted the TDP MMU's reference. + * See kvm_tdp_mmu_get_vcpu_root_hpa(). */ void kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(struct kvm *kvm) { struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
- lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock); - list_for_each_entry(root, &kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots, link) { - if (!root->role.invalid && - !WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root(root))) { + /* + * mmu_lock must be held for write to ensure that a root doesn't become + * invalid while there are active readers (invalidating a root while + * there are active readers may or may not be problematic in practice, + * but it's uncharted territory and not supported). + * + * Waive the assertion if there are no users of @kvm, i.e. the VM is + * being destroyed after all references have been put, or if no vCPUs + * have been created (which means there are no roots), i.e. the VM is + * being destroyed in an error path of KVM_CREATE_VM. + */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) && + refcount_read(&kvm->users_count) && kvm->created_vcpus) + lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock); + + /* + * As above, mmu_lock isn't held when destroying the VM! There can't + * be other references to @kvm, i.e. nothing else can invalidate roots + * or be consuming roots, but walking the list of roots does need to be + * guarded against roots being deleted by the asynchronous zap worker. + */ + rcu_read_lock(); + + list_for_each_entry_rcu(root, &kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots, link) { + if (!root->role.invalid) { root->role.invalid = true; tdp_mmu_schedule_zap_root(kvm, root); } } + + rcu_read_unlock(); }
/*