6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Artem Savkov asavkov@redhat.com
[ Upstream commit 971f7c32147f2d0953a815a109b22b8ed45949d4 ]
This test relies on bpf_testmod, so skip it if the module is not available.
Fixes: aa3d65de4b900 ("bpf/selftests: Test fentry attachment to shadowed functions") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov asavkov@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230914124928.340701-1-asavkov@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c index c7636e18b1ebd..aa9f67eb1c95b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c @@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ void test_module_fentry_shadow(void) int link_fd[2] = {}; __s32 btf_id[2] = {};
+ if (!env.has_testmod) { + test__skip(); + return; + } + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, load_opts, .expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_FENTRY, );