5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com
commit 2331fd4a49864e1571b4f50aa3aa1536ed6220d0 upstream.
After updating bb_free in mb_free_blocks, it is possible to return without updating bb_fragments because the block being freed is found to have already been freed, which leads to inconsistency between bb_free and bb_fragments.
Since the group may be unlocked in ext4_grp_locked_error(), this can lead to problems such as dividing by zero when calculating the average fragment length. Hence move the update of bb_free to after the block double-free check guarantees that the corresponding statistics are updated only after the core block bitmap is modified.
Fixes: eabe0444df90 ("ext4: speed-up releasing blocks on commit") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 Suggested-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-5-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu Signed-off-by: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -1835,11 +1835,6 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode mb_check_buddy(e4b); mb_free_blocks_double(inode, e4b, first, count);
- this_cpu_inc(discard_pa_seq); - e4b->bd_info->bb_free += count; - if (first < e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free) - e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free = first; - /* access memory sequentially: check left neighbour, * clear range and then check right neighbour */ @@ -1853,23 +1848,31 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); ext4_fsblk_t blocknr;
+ /* + * Fastcommit replay can free already freed blocks which + * corrupts allocation info. Regenerate it. + */ + if (sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY) { + mb_regenerate_buddy(e4b); + goto check; + } + blocknr = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, e4b->bd_group); blocknr += EXT4_C2B(sbi, block); - if (!(sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY)) { - ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group, - inode ? inode->i_ino : 0, - blocknr, - "freeing already freed block (bit %u); block bitmap corrupt.", - block); - ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted( - sb, e4b->bd_group, + ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group, + inode ? inode->i_ino : 0, blocknr, + "freeing already freed block (bit %u); block bitmap corrupt.", + block); + ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group, EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT); - } else { - mb_regenerate_buddy(e4b); - } - goto done; + return; }
+ this_cpu_inc(discard_pa_seq); + e4b->bd_info->bb_free += count; + if (first < e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free) + e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free = first; + /* let's maintain fragments counter */ if (left_is_free && right_is_free) e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments--; @@ -1894,9 +1897,9 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode if (first <= last) mb_buddy_mark_free(e4b, first >> 1, last >> 1);
-done: mb_set_largest_free_order(sb, e4b->bd_info); mb_update_avg_fragment_size(sb, e4b->bd_info); +check: mb_check_buddy(e4b); }