From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
[ Upstream commit 5fad775d432c6c9158ea12e7e00d8922ef8d3dfc ]
The max_cap parameter is never used in em_adjust_new_capacity(), so drop it.
No functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba lukasz.luba@arm.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2369979.ElGaqSPkdT@rjwysocki.net Stable-dep-of: 1ebe8f7e7825 ("PM: EM: Fix late boot with holes in CPU topology") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/power/energy_model.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c index 1c9fe741fe6d5..8ee72c6c1daf3 100644 --- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c +++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c @@ -723,8 +723,7 @@ static int em_recalc_and_update(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_domain *pd, * are correctly calculated. */ static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev, - struct em_perf_domain *pd, - u64 max_cap) + struct em_perf_domain *pd) { struct em_perf_table *em_table;
@@ -795,7 +794,7 @@ static void em_check_capacity_update(void) cpu, cpu_capacity, em_max_perf);
dev = get_cpu_device(cpu); - em_adjust_new_capacity(dev, pd, cpu_capacity); + em_adjust_new_capacity(dev, pd); }
free_cpumask_var(cpu_done_mask);