5.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Anand Jain anand.jain@oracle.com
commit 1cec3f27168d7835ff3d23ab371cd548440131bb upstream.
This fixes a longstanding lockdep warning triggered by fstests/btrfs/011.
Circular locking dependency check reports warning[1], that's because the btrfs_scrub_dev() calls the stack #0 below with, the fs_info::scrub_lock held. The test case leading to this warning:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /btrfs $ btrfs scrub start -B /btrfs
In fact we have fs_info::scrub_workers_refcnt to track if the init and destroy of the scrub workers are needed. So once we have incremented and decremented the fs_info::scrub_workers_refcnt value in the thread, its ok to drop the scrub_lock, and then actually do the btrfs_destroy_workqueue() part. So this patch drops the scrub_lock before calling btrfs_destroy_workqueue().
[359.258534] ====================================================== [359.260305] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [359.261938] 5.0.0-rc6-default #461 Not tainted [359.263135] ------------------------------------------------------ [359.264672] btrfs/20975 is trying to acquire lock: [359.265927] 00000000d4d32bea ((wq_completion)"%s-%s""btrfs", name){+.+.}, at: flush_workqueue+0x87/0x540 [359.268416] [359.268416] but task is already holding lock: [359.270061] 0000000053ea26a6 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x322/0x590 [btrfs] [359.272418] [359.272418] which lock already depends on the new lock. [359.272418] [359.274692] [359.274692] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [359.276671] [359.276671] -> #3 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}: [359.278187] __mutex_lock+0x86/0x9c0 [359.279086] btrfs_scrub_pause+0x31/0x100 [btrfs] [359.280421] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1e4/0x9e0 [btrfs] [359.281931] close_ctree+0x30b/0x350 [btrfs] [359.283208] generic_shutdown_super+0x64/0x100 [359.284516] kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 [359.285658] btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0xa0 [btrfs] [359.286964] deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 [359.288242] cleanup_mnt+0x3b/0x70 [359.289310] task_work_run+0x98/0xc0 [359.290428] exit_to_usermode_loop+0x83/0x90 [359.291445] do_syscall_64+0x15b/0x180 [359.292598] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [359.294011] [359.294011] -> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}: [359.295432] __sb_start_write+0x113/0x1d0 [359.296394] start_transaction+0x369/0x500 [btrfs] [359.297471] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x2aa/0x7c0 [btrfs] [359.298629] normal_work_helper+0xcd/0x530 [btrfs] [359.299698] process_one_work+0x246/0x610 [359.300898] worker_thread+0x3c/0x390 [359.302020] kthread+0x116/0x130 [359.303053] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [359.304152] [359.304152] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}: [359.306100] process_one_work+0x21f/0x610 [359.307302] worker_thread+0x3c/0x390 [359.308465] kthread+0x116/0x130 [359.309357] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [359.310229] [359.310229] -> #0 ((wq_completion)"%s-%s""btrfs", name){+.+.}: [359.311812] lock_acquire+0x90/0x180 [359.312929] flush_workqueue+0xaa/0x540 [359.313845] drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x180 [359.314761] destroy_workqueue+0x17/0x240 [359.315754] btrfs_destroy_workqueue+0x57/0x200 [btrfs] [359.317245] scrub_workers_put+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [359.318585] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x336/0x590 [btrfs] [359.319944] btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.19+0x179/0x1bb [btrfs] [359.321622] btrfs_ioctl+0x28a4/0x2e40 [btrfs] [359.322908] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6d0 [359.324021] ksys_ioctl+0x3a/0x70 [359.325066] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [359.326236] do_syscall_64+0x54/0x180 [359.327379] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [359.328772] [359.328772] other info that might help us debug this: [359.328772] [359.330990] Chain exists of: [359.330990] (wq_completion)"%s-%s""btrfs", name --> sb_internal#2 --> &fs_info->scrub_lock [359.330990] [359.334376] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [359.334376] [359.336020] CPU0 CPU1 [359.337070] ---- ---- [359.337821] lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); [359.338506] lock(sb_internal#2); [359.339506] lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); [359.341461] lock((wq_completion)"%s-%s""btrfs", name); [359.342437] [359.342437] *** DEADLOCK *** [359.342437] [359.343745] 1 lock held by btrfs/20975: [359.344788] #0: 0000000053ea26a6 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x322/0x590 [btrfs] [359.346778] [359.346778] stack backtrace: [359.347897] CPU: 0 PID: 20975 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.0.0-rc6-default #461 [359.348983] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626cc-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [359.350501] Call Trace: [359.350931] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [359.351676] print_circular_bug.isra.37.cold.56+0x15c/0x195 [359.353569] check_prev_add.constprop.44+0x4f9/0x750 [359.354849] ? check_prev_add.constprop.44+0x286/0x750 [359.356505] __lock_acquire+0xb84/0xf10 [359.357505] lock_acquire+0x90/0x180 [359.358271] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x540 [359.359098] flush_workqueue+0xaa/0x540 [359.359912] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x540 [359.360740] ? drain_workqueue+0x1e/0x180 [359.361565] ? drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x180 [359.362391] drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x180 [359.363193] destroy_workqueue+0x17/0x240 [359.364539] btrfs_destroy_workqueue+0x57/0x200 [btrfs] [359.365673] scrub_workers_put+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [359.366618] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x336/0x590 [btrfs] [359.367594] ? start_transaction+0xa1/0x500 [btrfs] [359.368679] btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.19+0x179/0x1bb [btrfs] [359.369545] btrfs_ioctl+0x28a4/0x2e40 [btrfs] [359.370186] ? __lock_acquire+0x263/0xf10 [359.370777] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [359.371392] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10 [359.372248] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 [359.372786] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xc0 [359.373662] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6d0 [359.374552] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6d0 [359.375378] ? do_sigaction+0xff/0x250 [359.376233] ksys_ioctl+0x3a/0x70 [359.376954] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [359.377772] do_syscall_64+0x54/0x180 [359.378841] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [359.380422] RIP: 0033:0x7f5429296a97
Backporting to older kernels: scrub_nocow_workers must be freed the same way as the others.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.jain@oracle.com [ update changelog ] Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c @@ -3770,16 +3770,6 @@ fail_scrub_workers: return -ENOMEM; }
-static noinline_for_stack void scrub_workers_put(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) -{ - if (--fs_info->scrub_workers_refcnt == 0) { - btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->scrub_workers); - btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->scrub_wr_completion_workers); - btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->scrub_parity_workers); - } - WARN_ON(fs_info->scrub_workers_refcnt < 0); -} - int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 devid, u64 start, u64 end, struct btrfs_scrub_progress *progress, int readonly, int is_dev_replace) @@ -3788,6 +3778,9 @@ int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info int ret; struct btrfs_device *dev; unsigned int nofs_flag; + struct btrfs_workqueue *scrub_workers = NULL; + struct btrfs_workqueue *scrub_wr_comp = NULL; + struct btrfs_workqueue *scrub_parity = NULL;
if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info)) return -EINVAL; @@ -3927,9 +3920,16 @@ int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info
mutex_lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); dev->scrub_ctx = NULL; - scrub_workers_put(fs_info); + if (--fs_info->scrub_workers_refcnt == 0) { + scrub_workers = fs_info->scrub_workers; + scrub_wr_comp = fs_info->scrub_wr_completion_workers; + scrub_parity = fs_info->scrub_parity_workers; + } mutex_unlock(&fs_info->scrub_lock);
+ btrfs_destroy_workqueue(scrub_workers); + btrfs_destroy_workqueue(scrub_wr_comp); + btrfs_destroy_workqueue(scrub_parity); scrub_put_ctx(sctx);
return ret;