6.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Taehee Yoo ap420073@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 919f9f497dbcee75d487400e8f9815b74a6a37df ]
The bnxt_queue_{start | stop}() access vnic_info as much as allocated, which indicates bp->nr_vnics. So, it should not reach bp->vnic_info[bp->nr_vnics].
Fixes: 661958552eda ("eth: bnxt: do not use BNXT_VNIC_NTUPLE unconditionally in queue restart logic") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo ap420073@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Michael Chan michael.chan@broadcom.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250316025837.939527-1-ap420073@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni pabeni@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c index 55f553debd3b2..0ddc3d41e2d81 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c @@ -15651,7 +15651,7 @@ static int bnxt_queue_start(struct net_device *dev, void *qmem, int idx) cpr = &rxr->bnapi->cp_ring; cpr->sw_stats->rx.rx_resets++;
- for (i = 0; i <= bp->nr_vnics; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < bp->nr_vnics; i++) { vnic = &bp->vnic_info[i];
rc = bnxt_hwrm_vnic_set_rss_p5(bp, vnic, true); @@ -15679,7 +15679,7 @@ static int bnxt_queue_stop(struct net_device *dev, void *qmem, int idx) struct bnxt_vnic_info *vnic; int i;
- for (i = 0; i <= bp->nr_vnics; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < bp->nr_vnics; i++) { vnic = &bp->vnic_info[i]; vnic->mru = 0; bnxt_hwrm_vnic_update(bp, vnic,