9 Jun
2025
9 Jun
'25
8:06 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 03:44:19PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 09:18:02PM +0800, yunhui cui wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 6:10 PM Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 03:43:45PM +0800, Yunhui Cui wrote:
...
- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this.
Can this issue reported by the bot be ignored?
No, why? How do we know what changed from previous versions? Otherwise we assume you just ignored previous review comments?
This series took at least 8 tries for some reason, might as well document it, right? :)
+ many to what Greg said. The main problem you have is the absence of cover letter, where it's naturally to put changelog for the series.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko