On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 6:04 AM gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 669281ee7ef731fb5204df9d948669bf32a5e68d # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to 'stable@vger.kernel.org' --in-reply-to '2023090959-mothproof-scarf-6195@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
669281ee7ef7 ("Multi-gen LRU: fix per-zone reclaim") 6df1b2212950 ("mm: multi-gen LRU: rename lrugen->lists[] to lrugen->folios[]")
Hi Greg,
Can you apply in this order please:
1) 6df1b2212950 ("mm: multi-gen LRU: rename lrugen->lists[] to lrugen->folios[]") 2) 669281ee7ef7 ("Multi-gen LRU: fix per-zone reclaim")
With the one rename dependency, I've checked that this applies cleanly and tested it. Or let me know if you prefer I resend both.
Thanks, Kalesh
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 669281ee7ef731fb5204df9d948669bf32a5e68d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kalesh Singh kaleshsingh@google.com Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 19:56:02 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Multi-gen LRU: fix per-zone reclaim
MGLRU has a LRU list for each zone for each type (anon/file) in each generation:
long nr_pages[MAX_NR_GENS][ANON_AND_FILE][MAX_NR_ZONES];The min_seq (oldest generation) can progress independently for each type but the max_seq (youngest generation) is shared for both anon and file. This is to maintain a common frame of reference.
In order for eviction to advance the min_seq of a type, all the per-zone lists in the oldest generation of that type must be empty.
The eviction logic only considers pages from eligible zones for eviction or promotion.
scan_folios() { ... for (zone = sc->reclaim_idx; zone >= 0; zone--) { ... sort_folio(); // Promote ... isolate_folio(); // Evict } ... }Consider the system has the movable zone configured and default 4 generations. The current state of the system is as shown below (only illustrating one type for simplicity):
Type: ANON
Zone DMA32 Normal Movable Device Gen 0 0 0 4GB 0 Gen 1 0 1GB 1MB 0 Gen 2 1MB 4GB 1MB 0 Gen 3 1MB 1MB 1MB 0Now consider there is a GFP_KERNEL allocation request (eligible zone index <= Normal), evict_folios() will return without doing any work since there are no pages to scan in the eligible zones of the oldest generation. Reclaim won't make progress until triggered from a ZONE_MOVABLE allocation request; which may not happen soon if there is a lot of free memory in the movable zone. This can lead to OOM kills, although there is 1GB pages in the Normal zone of Gen 1 that we have not yet tried to reclaim.
This issue is not seen in the conventional active/inactive LRU since there are no per-zone lists.
If there are no (not enough) folios to scan in the eligible zones, move folios from ineligible zone (zone_index > reclaim_index) to the next generation. This allows for the progression of min_seq and reclaiming from the next generation (Gen 1).
Qualcomm, Mediatek and raspberrypi [1] discovered this issue independently.
[1] https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/5395
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230802025606.346758-1-kaleshsingh@google.com Fixes: ac35a4902374 ("mm: multi-gen LRU: minimal implementation") Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh kaleshsingh@google.com Reported-by: Charan Teja Kalla quic_charante@quicinc.com Reported-by: Lecopzer Chen lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com [mediatek] Tested-by: Charan Teja Kalla quic_charante@quicinc.com Cc: Yu Zhao yuzhao@google.com Cc: Barry Song baohua@kernel.org Cc: Brian Geffon bgeffon@google.com Cc: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) heftig@archlinux.org Cc: Matthias Brugger matthias.bgg@gmail.com Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko oleksandr@natalenko.name Cc: Qi Zheng zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com Cc: Steven Barrett steven@liquorix.net Cc: Suleiman Souhlal suleiman@google.com Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan surenb@google.com Cc: Aneesh Kumar K V aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 4039620d30fe..489a4fc7d9b1 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -4889,7 +4889,8 @@ static int lru_gen_memcg_seg(struct lruvec *lruvec)
the eviction******************************************************************************/
-static bool sort_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, int tier_idx) +static bool sort_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, struct scan_control *sc,
int tier_idx){ bool success; int gen = folio_lru_gen(folio); @@ -4939,6 +4940,13 @@ static bool sort_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, int tier_idx) return true; }
/* ineligible */if (zone > sc->reclaim_idx) {gen = folio_inc_gen(lruvec, folio, false);list_move_tail(&folio->lru, &lrugen->folios[gen][type][zone]);return true;}/* waiting for writeback */ if (folio_test_locked(folio) || folio_test_writeback(folio) || (type == LRU_GEN_FILE && folio_test_dirty(folio))) {@@ -4987,7 +4995,8 @@ static bool isolate_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, struct sca static int scan_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int type, int tier, struct list_head *list) {
int gen, zone;
int i;int gen; enum vm_event_item item; int sorted = 0; int scanned = 0;@@ -5003,9 +5012,10 @@ static int scan_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
gen = lru_gen_from_seq(lrugen->min_seq[type]);
for (zone = sc->reclaim_idx; zone >= 0; zone--) {
for (i = MAX_NR_ZONES; i > 0; i--) { LIST_HEAD(moved); int skipped = 0;int zone = (sc->reclaim_idx + i) % MAX_NR_ZONES; struct list_head *head = &lrugen->folios[gen][type][zone]; while (!list_empty(head)) {@@ -5019,7 +5029,7 @@ static int scan_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
scanned += delta;
if (sort_folio(lruvec, folio, tier))
if (sort_folio(lruvec, folio, sc, tier)) sorted += delta; else if (isolate_folio(lruvec, folio, sc)) { list_add(&folio->lru, list);