From: hersen wu hersenxs.wu@amd.com
commit 8b0379a85762b516c7b46aed7dbf2a4947c00564 upstream.
[Why] ramp_up_dispclk_with_dpp is to change dispclk, dppclk and dprefclk according to bandwidth requirement. call stack: rv1_update_clocks --> update_clocks --> dcn10_prepare_bandwidth / dcn10_optimize_bandwidth --> prepare_bandwidth / optimize_bandwidth. before change dcn hw, prepare_bandwidth will be called first to allow enough clock, watermark for change, after end of dcn hw change, optimize_bandwidth is executed to lower clock to save power for new dcn hw settings.
below is sequence of commit_planes_for_stream: step 1: prepare_bandwidth - raise clock to have enough bandwidth step 2: lock_doublebuffer_enable step 3: pipe_control_lock(true) - make dchubp register change will not take effect right way step 4: apply_ctx_for_surface - program dchubp step 5: pipe_control_lock(false) - dchubp register change take effect step 6: optimize_bandwidth --> dc_post_update_surfaces_to_stream for full_date, optimize clock to save power
at end of step 1, dcn clocks (dprefclk, dispclk, dppclk) may be changed for new dchubp configuration. but real dcn hub dchubps are still running with old configuration until end of step 5. this need clocks settings at step 1 should not less than that before step 1. this is checked by two conditions: 1. if (should_set_clock(safe_to_lower , new_clocks->dispclk_khz, clk_mgr_base->clks.dispclk_khz) || new_clocks->dispclk_khz == clk_mgr_base->clks.dispclk_khz) 2. request_dpp_div = new_clocks->dispclk_khz > new_clocks->dppclk_khz
the second condition is based on new dchubp configuration. dppclk for new dchubp may be different from dppclk before step 1. for example, before step 1, dchubps are as below: pipe 0: recout=(0,40,1920,980) viewport=(0,0,1920,979) pipe 1: recout=(0,0,1920,1080) viewport=(0,0,1920,1080) for dppclk for pipe0 need dppclk = dispclk
new dchubp pipe split configuration: pipe 0: recout=(0,0,960,1080) viewport=(0,0,960,1080) pipe 1: recout=(960,0,960,1080) viewport=(960,0,960,1080) dppclk only needs dppclk = dispclk /2.
dispclk, dppclk are not lock by otg master lock. they take effect after step 1. during this transition, dispclk are the same, but dppclk is changed to half of previous clock for old dchubp configuration between step 1 and step 6. This may cause p-state warning intermittently.
[How] for new_clocks->dispclk_khz == clk_mgr_base->clks.dispclk_khz, we need make sure dppclk are not changed to less between step 1 and 6. for new_clocks->dispclk_khz > clk_mgr_base->clks.dispclk_khz, new display clock is raised, but we do not know ratio of new_clocks->dispclk_khz and clk_mgr_base->clks.dispclk_khz, new_clocks->dispclk_khz /2 does not guarantee equal or higher than old dppclk. we could ignore power saving different between dppclk = displck and dppclk = dispclk / 2 between step 1 and step 6. as long as safe_to_lower = false, set dpclk = dispclk to simplify condition check.
CC: Stable stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hersen Wu hersenxs.wu@amd.com Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr Aric.Cyr@amd.com Acked-by: Eryk Brol eryk.brol@amd.com Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn10/rv1_clk_mgr.c | 69 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn10/rv1_clk_mgr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn10/rv1_clk_mgr.c @@ -85,12 +85,77 @@ static int rv1_determine_dppclk_threshol return disp_clk_threshold; }
-static void ramp_up_dispclk_with_dpp(struct clk_mgr_internal *clk_mgr, struct dc *dc, struct dc_clocks *new_clocks) +static void ramp_up_dispclk_with_dpp( + struct clk_mgr_internal *clk_mgr, + struct dc *dc, + struct dc_clocks *new_clocks, + bool safe_to_lower) { int i; int dispclk_to_dpp_threshold = rv1_determine_dppclk_threshold(clk_mgr, new_clocks); bool request_dpp_div = new_clocks->dispclk_khz > new_clocks->dppclk_khz;
+ /* this function is to change dispclk, dppclk and dprefclk according to + * bandwidth requirement. Its call stack is rv1_update_clocks --> + * update_clocks --> dcn10_prepare_bandwidth / dcn10_optimize_bandwidth + * --> prepare_bandwidth / optimize_bandwidth. before change dcn hw, + * prepare_bandwidth will be called first to allow enough clock, + * watermark for change, after end of dcn hw change, optimize_bandwidth + * is executed to lower clock to save power for new dcn hw settings. + * + * below is sequence of commit_planes_for_stream: + * + * step 1: prepare_bandwidth - raise clock to have enough bandwidth + * step 2: lock_doublebuffer_enable + * step 3: pipe_control_lock(true) - make dchubp register change will + * not take effect right way + * step 4: apply_ctx_for_surface - program dchubp + * step 5: pipe_control_lock(false) - dchubp register change take effect + * step 6: optimize_bandwidth --> dc_post_update_surfaces_to_stream + * for full_date, optimize clock to save power + * + * at end of step 1, dcn clocks (dprefclk, dispclk, dppclk) may be + * changed for new dchubp configuration. but real dcn hub dchubps are + * still running with old configuration until end of step 5. this need + * clocks settings at step 1 should not less than that before step 1. + * this is checked by two conditions: 1. if (should_set_clock(safe_to_lower + * , new_clocks->dispclk_khz, clk_mgr_base->clks.dispclk_khz) || + * new_clocks->dispclk_khz == clk_mgr_base->clks.dispclk_khz) + * 2. request_dpp_div = new_clocks->dispclk_khz > new_clocks->dppclk_khz + * + * the second condition is based on new dchubp configuration. dppclk + * for new dchubp may be different from dppclk before step 1. + * for example, before step 1, dchubps are as below: + * pipe 0: recout=(0,40,1920,980) viewport=(0,0,1920,979) + * pipe 1: recout=(0,0,1920,1080) viewport=(0,0,1920,1080) + * for dppclk for pipe0 need dppclk = dispclk + * + * new dchubp pipe split configuration: + * pipe 0: recout=(0,0,960,1080) viewport=(0,0,960,1080) + * pipe 1: recout=(960,0,960,1080) viewport=(960,0,960,1080) + * dppclk only needs dppclk = dispclk /2. + * + * dispclk, dppclk are not lock by otg master lock. they take effect + * after step 1. during this transition, dispclk are the same, but + * dppclk is changed to half of previous clock for old dchubp + * configuration between step 1 and step 6. This may cause p-state + * warning intermittently. + * + * for new_clocks->dispclk_khz == clk_mgr_base->clks.dispclk_khz, we + * need make sure dppclk are not changed to less between step 1 and 6. + * for new_clocks->dispclk_khz > clk_mgr_base->clks.dispclk_khz, + * new display clock is raised, but we do not know ratio of + * new_clocks->dispclk_khz and clk_mgr_base->clks.dispclk_khz, + * new_clocks->dispclk_khz /2 does not guarantee equal or higher than + * old dppclk. we could ignore power saving different between + * dppclk = displck and dppclk = dispclk / 2 between step 1 and step 6. + * as long as safe_to_lower = false, set dpclk = dispclk to simplify + * condition check. + * todo: review this change for other asic. + **/ + if (!safe_to_lower) + request_dpp_div = false; + /* set disp clk to dpp clk threshold */
clk_mgr->funcs->set_dispclk(clk_mgr, dispclk_to_dpp_threshold); @@ -209,7 +274,7 @@ static void rv1_update_clocks(struct clk /* program dispclk on = as a w/a for sleep resume clock ramping issues */ if (should_set_clock(safe_to_lower, new_clocks->dispclk_khz, clk_mgr_base->clks.dispclk_khz) || new_clocks->dispclk_khz == clk_mgr_base->clks.dispclk_khz) { - ramp_up_dispclk_with_dpp(clk_mgr, dc, new_clocks); + ramp_up_dispclk_with_dpp(clk_mgr, dc, new_clocks, safe_to_lower); clk_mgr_base->clks.dispclk_khz = new_clocks->dispclk_khz; send_request_to_lower = true; }