6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Aakash Menon aakash.r.menon@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 151ac45348afc5b56baa584c7cd4876addf461ff ]
Bit 270-271 are occasionally unexpectedly set by the hardware. This issue was observed with 10G SFPs causing huge time errors (> 30ms) in PTP. Only 30 bits are needed for the nanosecond part of the timestamp, clear 2 most significant bits before extracting timestamp from the internal frame header.
Fixes: 70dfe25cd866 ("net: sparx5: Update extraction/injection for timestamping") Signed-off-by: Aakash Menon aakash.menon@protempis.com Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur horatiu.vultur@microchip.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c index f3f5fb4204689..70427643f777c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c @@ -45,8 +45,12 @@ void sparx5_ifh_parse(u32 *ifh, struct frame_info *info) fwd = (fwd >> 5); info->src_port = FIELD_GET(GENMASK(7, 1), fwd);
+ /* + * Bit 270-271 are occasionally unexpectedly set by the hardware, + * clear bits before extracting timestamp + */ info->timestamp = - ((u64)xtr_hdr[2] << 24) | + ((u64)(xtr_hdr[2] & GENMASK(5, 0)) << 24) | ((u64)xtr_hdr[3] << 16) | ((u64)xtr_hdr[4] << 8) | ((u64)xtr_hdr[5] << 0);