The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 604234f33658cdd72f686be405a99646b397d0b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jordan Crouse jcrouse@codeaurora.org Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 20:03:11 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] drm/msm: Enable expanded apriv support for a650
a650 supports expanded apriv support that allows us to map critical buffers (ringbuffer and memstore) as as privileged to protect them from corruption.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse jcrouse@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Rob Clark robdclark@chromium.org
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c index c5a3e4d4c007..406efaac95a7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c @@ -678,7 +678,8 @@ static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) A6XX_PROTECT_RDONLY(0x980, 0x4)); gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_PROTECT(25), A6XX_PROTECT_RW(0xa630, 0x0));
- if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu)) { + /* Enable expanded apriv for targets that support it */ + if (gpu->hw_apriv) { gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_APRIV_CNTL, (1 << 6) | (1 << 5) | (1 << 3) | (1 << 2) | (1 << 1)); } @@ -1056,6 +1057,9 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev) adreno_gpu->registers = NULL; adreno_gpu->reg_offsets = a6xx_register_offsets;
+ if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu)) + adreno_gpu->base.hw_apriv = true; + ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs, 1); if (ret) { a6xx_destroy(&(a6xx_gpu->base.base)); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c index d5645472b25d..57ddc9438351 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c @@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ int msm_gpu_init(struct drm_device *drm, struct platform_device *pdev,
memptrs = msm_gem_kernel_new(drm, sizeof(struct msm_rbmemptrs) * nr_rings, - MSM_BO_UNCACHED, gpu->aspace, &gpu->memptrs_bo, + check_apriv(gpu, MSM_BO_UNCACHED), gpu->aspace, &gpu->memptrs_bo, &memptrs_iova);
if (IS_ERR(memptrs)) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h index 0db117a7339b..37cffac4cbe3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include "msm_drv.h" #include "msm_fence.h" #include "msm_ringbuffer.h" +#include "msm_gem.h"
struct msm_gem_submit; struct msm_gpu_perfcntr; @@ -139,6 +140,8 @@ struct msm_gpu { } devfreq;
struct msm_gpu_state *crashstate; + /* True if the hardware supports expanded apriv (a650 and newer) */ + bool hw_apriv; };
/* It turns out that all targets use the same ringbuffer size */ @@ -327,4 +330,12 @@ static inline void msm_gpu_crashstate_put(struct msm_gpu *gpu) mutex_unlock(&gpu->dev->struct_mutex); }
+/* + * Simple macro to semi-cleanly add the MAP_PRIV flag for targets that can + * support expanded privileges + */ +#define check_apriv(gpu, flags) \ + (((gpu)->hw_apriv ? MSM_BO_MAP_PRIV : 0) | (flags)) + + #endif /* __MSM_GPU_H__ */ diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c index 39ecb5a18431..935bf9b1d941 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ struct msm_ringbuffer *msm_ringbuffer_new(struct msm_gpu *gpu, int id, ring->id = id;
ring->start = msm_gem_kernel_new(gpu->dev, MSM_GPU_RINGBUFFER_SZ, - MSM_BO_WC | MSM_BO_GPU_READONLY, gpu->aspace, &ring->bo, - &ring->iova); + check_apriv(gpu, MSM_BO_WC | MSM_BO_GPU_READONLY), + gpu->aspace, &ring->bo, &ring->iova);
if (IS_ERR(ring->start)) { ret = PTR_ERR(ring->start);