5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ryusuke Konishi konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
commit 5bc09b397cbf1221f8a8aacb1152650c9195b02b upstream.
According to a syzbot report, end_buffer_async_write(), which handles the completion of block device writes, may detect abnormal condition of the buffer async_write flag and cause a BUG_ON failure when using nilfs2.
Nilfs2 itself does not use end_buffer_async_write(). But, the async_write flag is now used as a marker by commit 7f42ec394156 ("nilfs2: fix issue with race condition of competition between segments for dirty blocks") as a means of resolving double list insertion of dirty blocks in nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers() and nilfs_lookup_node_buffers() and the resulting crash.
This modification is safe as long as it is used for file data and b-tree node blocks where the page caches are independent. However, it was irrelevant and redundant to also introduce async_write for segment summary and super root blocks that share buffers with the backing device. This led to the possibility that the BUG_ON check in end_buffer_async_write would fail as described above, if independent writebacks of the backing device occurred in parallel.
The use of async_write for segment summary buffers has already been removed in a previous change.
Fix this issue by removing the manipulation of the async_write flag for the remaining super root block buffer.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240203161645.4992-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Fixes: 7f42ec394156 ("nilfs2: fix issue with race condition of competition between segments for dirty blocks") Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+5c04210f7c7f897c1e7f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/00000000000019a97c05fd42f8c8@google.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c @@ -1707,7 +1707,6 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_prepare_write(
list_for_each_entry(bh, &segbuf->sb_payload_buffers, b_assoc_buffers) { - set_buffer_async_write(bh); if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) { if (bh->b_page != bd_page) { lock_page(bd_page); @@ -1718,6 +1717,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_prepare_write( } break; } + set_buffer_async_write(bh); if (bh->b_page != fs_page) { nilfs_begin_page_io(fs_page); fs_page = bh->b_page; @@ -1803,7 +1803,6 @@ static void nilfs_abort_logs(struct list
list_for_each_entry(bh, &segbuf->sb_payload_buffers, b_assoc_buffers) { - clear_buffer_async_write(bh); if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) { clear_buffer_uptodate(bh); if (bh->b_page != bd_page) { @@ -1812,6 +1811,7 @@ static void nilfs_abort_logs(struct list } break; } + clear_buffer_async_write(bh); if (bh->b_page != fs_page) { nilfs_end_page_io(fs_page, err); fs_page = bh->b_page; @@ -1899,8 +1899,9 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_complete_write BIT(BH_Delay) | BIT(BH_NILFS_Volatile) | BIT(BH_NILFS_Redirected));
- set_mask_bits(&bh->b_state, clear_bits, set_bits); if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) { + set_buffer_uptodate(bh); + clear_buffer_dirty(bh); if (bh->b_page != bd_page) { end_page_writeback(bd_page); bd_page = bh->b_page; @@ -1908,6 +1909,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_complete_write update_sr = true; break; } + set_mask_bits(&bh->b_state, clear_bits, set_bits); if (bh->b_page != fs_page) { nilfs_end_page_io(fs_page, 0); fs_page = bh->b_page;