6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Biggers ebiggers@kernel.org
commit 68279380266a5fa70e664de754503338e2ec3f43 upstream.
Commit 88c02b3f79a6 ("s390/sha3: Support sha3 performance enhancements") added the field s390_sha_ctx::first_message_part and made it be used by s390_sha_update() (now s390_sha_update_blocks()). At the time, s390_sha_update() was used by all the s390 SHA-1, SHA-2, and SHA-3 algorithms. However, only the initialization functions for SHA-3 were updated, leaving SHA-1 and SHA-2 using first_message_part uninitialized.
This could cause e.g. the function code CPACF_KIMD_SHA_512 | CPACF_KIMD_NIP to be used instead of just CPACF_KIMD_SHA_512. This apparently was harmless, as the SHA-1 and SHA-2 function codes ignore CPACF_KIMD_NIP; it is recognized only by the SHA-3 function codes (https://lore.kernel.org/r/73477fe9-a1dc-4e38-98a6-eba9921e8afa@linux.ibm.com...). Therefore, this bug was found only when first_message_part was later converted to a boolean and UBSAN detected its uninitialized use. Regardless, let's fix this by just initializing to zero.
Note: in 6.16, we need to patch SHA-1, SHA-384, and SHA-512. In 6.15 and earlier, we'll also need to patch SHA-224 and SHA-256, as they hadn't yet been librarified (which incidentally fixed this bug).
Fixes: 88c02b3f79a6 ("s390/sha3: Support sha3 performance enhancements") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Ingo Franzki ifranzki@linux.ibm.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/12740696-595c-4604-873e-aefe8b405fbf@linux.ibm.com Acked-by: Heiko Carstens hca@linux.ibm.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250703172316.7914-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/s390/crypto/sha1_s390.c | 2 ++ arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c | 3 +++ arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/sha1_s390.c +++ b/arch/s390/crypto/sha1_s390.c @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ static int s390_sha1_init(struct shash_d sctx->state[4] = SHA1_H4; sctx->count = 0; sctx->func = CPACF_KIMD_SHA_1; + sctx->first_message_part = 0;
return 0; } @@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ static int s390_sha1_import(struct shash memcpy(sctx->state, ictx->state, sizeof(ictx->state)); memcpy(sctx->buf, ictx->buffer, sizeof(ictx->buffer)); sctx->func = CPACF_KIMD_SHA_1; + sctx->first_message_part = 0; return 0; }
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c +++ b/arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ static int s390_sha256_init(struct shash sctx->state[7] = SHA256_H7; sctx->count = 0; sctx->func = CPACF_KIMD_SHA_256; + sctx->first_message_part = 0;
return 0; } @@ -55,6 +56,7 @@ static int sha256_import(struct shash_de memcpy(sctx->state, ictx->state, sizeof(ictx->state)); memcpy(sctx->buf, ictx->buf, sizeof(ictx->buf)); sctx->func = CPACF_KIMD_SHA_256; + sctx->first_message_part = 0; return 0; }
@@ -90,6 +92,7 @@ static int s390_sha224_init(struct shash sctx->state[7] = SHA224_H7; sctx->count = 0; sctx->func = CPACF_KIMD_SHA_256; + sctx->first_message_part = 0;
return 0; } --- a/arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c +++ b/arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static int sha512_init(struct shash_desc *(__u64 *)&ctx->state[14] = SHA512_H7; ctx->count = 0; ctx->func = CPACF_KIMD_SHA_512; + ctx->first_message_part = 0;
return 0; } @@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ static int sha512_import(struct shash_de memcpy(sctx->state, ictx->state, sizeof(ictx->state)); memcpy(sctx->buf, ictx->buf, sizeof(ictx->buf)); sctx->func = CPACF_KIMD_SHA_512; + sctx->first_message_part = 0; return 0; }
@@ -97,6 +99,7 @@ static int sha384_init(struct shash_desc *(__u64 *)&ctx->state[14] = SHA384_H7; ctx->count = 0; ctx->func = CPACF_KIMD_SHA_512; + ctx->first_message_part = 0;
return 0; }