On 2/13/24 9:27 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:18:43AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
This first patch fails to apply to the 6.6.y tree, are you sure you made it against the correct one? These functions do not look like this to me.
Sorry my bad, refreshing them for 6.1-stable and I guess I did that before I sent them out. Hence the mua used the new copy...
Here are the ones I have in my local tree, from testing.
Now queued up, but to confirm, 6.1.y did NOT need these, right?
Correct, it's not required. Would be nice to have, but I'd need to backport more things. So I think it's better if we leave 6.1-stable as-is for now.