This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
crypto: inside-secure - fix request allocations in invalidation path
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git%3Ba=su...
The filename of the patch is: crypto-inside-secure-fix-request-allocations-in-invalidation-path.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it.
From foo@baz Wed Feb 28 16:23:28 CET 2018
From: "Antoine Ténart" antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:10:57 +0100 Subject: crypto: inside-secure - fix request allocations in invalidation path
From: "Antoine Ténart" antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com
[ Upstream commit 7cad2fabd5691dbb17762877d4e7f236fe4bc181 ]
This patch makes use of the SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK and AHASH_REQUEST_ON_STACK helpers to allocate enough memory to contain both the crypto request structures and their embedded context (__ctx).
Fixes: 1b44c5a60c13 ("crypto: inside-secure - add SafeXcel EIP197 crypto engine driver") Suggested-by: Ofer Heifetz oferh@marvell.com Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@verizon.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c | 16 ++++++++-------- drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c | 14 +++++++------- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c @@ -422,25 +422,25 @@ static int safexcel_cipher_exit_inv(stru { struct safexcel_cipher_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm); struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv; - struct skcipher_request req; - struct safexcel_cipher_req *sreq = skcipher_request_ctx(&req); + SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK(req, __crypto_skcipher_cast(tfm)); + struct safexcel_cipher_req *sreq = skcipher_request_ctx(req); struct safexcel_inv_result result = {}; int ring = ctx->base.ring;
- memset(&req, 0, sizeof(struct skcipher_request)); + memset(req, 0, sizeof(struct skcipher_request));
/* create invalidation request */ init_completion(&result.completion); - skcipher_request_set_callback(&req, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG, - safexcel_inv_complete, &result); + skcipher_request_set_callback(req, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG, + safexcel_inv_complete, &result);
- skcipher_request_set_tfm(&req, __crypto_skcipher_cast(tfm)); - ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req.base.tfm); + skcipher_request_set_tfm(req, __crypto_skcipher_cast(tfm)); + ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req->base.tfm); ctx->base.exit_inv = true; sreq->needs_inv = true;
spin_lock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock); - crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, &req.base); + crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, &req->base); spin_unlock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock);
if (!priv->ring[ring].need_dequeue) --- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c @@ -470,25 +470,25 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_exit_inv(struc { struct safexcel_ahash_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm); struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv; - struct ahash_request req; - struct safexcel_ahash_req *rctx = ahash_request_ctx(&req); + AHASH_REQUEST_ON_STACK(req, __crypto_ahash_cast(tfm)); + struct safexcel_ahash_req *rctx = ahash_request_ctx(req); struct safexcel_inv_result result = {}; int ring = ctx->base.ring;
- memset(&req, 0, sizeof(struct ahash_request)); + memset(req, 0, sizeof(struct ahash_request));
/* create invalidation request */ init_completion(&result.completion); - ahash_request_set_callback(&req, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG, + ahash_request_set_callback(req, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG, safexcel_inv_complete, &result);
- ahash_request_set_tfm(&req, __crypto_ahash_cast(tfm)); - ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req.base.tfm); + ahash_request_set_tfm(req, __crypto_ahash_cast(tfm)); + ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req->base.tfm); ctx->base.exit_inv = true; rctx->needs_inv = true;
spin_lock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock); - crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, &req.base); + crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, &req->base); spin_unlock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock);
if (!priv->ring[ring].need_dequeue)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com are
queue-4.14/crypto-inside-secure-per-request-invalidation.patch queue-4.14/crypto-inside-secure-fix-request-allocations-in-invalidation-path.patch queue-4.14/crypto-inside-secure-free-requests-even-if-their-handling-failed.patch