On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 15:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:20:32PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
Hi Greg and Linus,
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 12:45, Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 01:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.20 release. There are 661 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 03 Mar 2021 19:34:53 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.20-rc2... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. Regressions detected on all devices (arm64, arm, x86_64 and i386).
hangup01 1 TFAIL : hangup01.c:133: unexpected message 3
This failure is specific to stable-rc 5.10 and 5.11. Test PASS on mainline and Linux next kernel.
I have reverted these two patches and the test case got PASS on Linux version 5.10.20-rc2.
hangup01 1 TPASS : child process exited with status 0
Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org tty: implement read_iter
Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org tty: convert tty_ldisc_ops 'read()' function to take a kernel pointer
Odd.
Is 5.12-rc1 also failing with this test as well?
No. Test PASS on v5.12-rc1.
- Naresh