On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 05:49:15PM -0700, Long Li wrote:
From: Long Li longli@microsoft.com
It's not necessary to allocate another iov when going through the buffers in smbd_send() through RDMA send.
Remove it to reduce stack size.
Signed-off-by: Long Li longli@microsoft.com
fs/cifs/smbdirect.c | 36 ++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c index b5c6c0d..f575e9a 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c +++ b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c @@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@ int smbd_send(struct smbd_connection *info, struct smb_rqst *rqst) int start, i, j; int max_iov_size = info->max_send_size - sizeof(struct smbd_data_transfer);
- struct kvec iov[SMBDIRECT_MAX_SGE];
- struct kvec *iov; int rc;
info->smbd_send_pending++; @@ -2099,32 +2099,20 @@ int smbd_send(struct smbd_connection *info, struct smb_rqst *rqst) } /*
* This usually means a configuration error
* We use RDMA read/write for packet size > rdma_readwrite_threshold
* as long as it's properly configured we should never get into this
* situation
*/
- if (rqst->rq_nvec + rqst->rq_npages > SMBDIRECT_MAX_SGE) {
log_write(ERR, "maximum send segment %x exceeding %x\n",
rqst->rq_nvec + rqst->rq_npages, SMBDIRECT_MAX_SGE);
rc = -EINVAL;
goto done;
- }
- /*
* Remove the RFC1002 length defined in MS-SMB2 section 2.1
* It is used only for TCP transport
* Skip the RFC1002 length defined in MS-SMB2 section 2.1
* It is used only for TCP transport in the iov[0]
*/
- In future we may want to add a transport layer under protocol
- layer so this will only be issued to TCP transport
- iov[0].iov_base = (char *)rqst->rq_iov[0].iov_base + 4;
- iov[0].iov_len = rqst->rq_iov[0].iov_len - 4;
- buflen += iov[0].iov_len;
- if (rqst->rq_iov[0].iov_len != 4) {
log_write(ERR, "expected the pdu length in 1st iov, but got 0x%lu\n", rqst->rq_iov[0].iov_len);
return -EINVAL;
- }
- iov = &rqst->rq_iov[1];
/* total up iov array first */
- for (i = 1; i < rqst->rq_nvec; i++) {
iov[i].iov_base = rqst->rq_iov[i].iov_base;
iov[i].iov_len = rqst->rq_iov[i].iov_len;
- for (i = 0; i < rqst->rq_nvec-1; i++) { buflen += iov[i].iov_len; }
@@ -2197,14 +2185,14 @@ int smbd_send(struct smbd_connection *info, struct smb_rqst *rqst) goto done; } i++;
if (i == rqst->rq_nvec)
} else { i++;if (i == rqst->rq_nvec-1) break; } start = i; buflen = 0;
if (i == rqst->rq_nvec) {
if (i == rqst->rq_nvec-1) { /* send out all remaining vecs */ remaining_data_length -= buflen; log_write(INFO,
-- 2.7.4
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.
</formletter>