On 04/03/2024 11:32, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 11:07:01AM +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
On 04/03/2024 09:30, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
(...)
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 7092dbee23282b6fcf1313fc64e2b92649ee16e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Geliang Tang tanggeliang@kylinos.cn Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:14:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr
Now both a v4 address and a v4-mapped address are supported when destroying a userspace pm subflow, this patch adds a second subflow to "userspace pm add & remove address" test, and two subflows could be removed two different ways, one with the v4mapped and one with v4.
I don't think it is worth having this patch backported to v6.1: there are a lot of conflicts because this patch depends on many others. Also, many CIs validating stable trees will use the selftests from the last stable version, I suppose. So this new test will be validated on older versions.
For v6.6 and v6.7, I can help to fix conflicts. I will just wait for the "queue/6.6" and "queue/6.7" branches to be updated with the latest patches :)
Should all now be up to date,
Maybe we are not talking about the same thing: are the "queue/X.Y" branches from the "linux-stable-rc" repo [1] not updated automatically when patches are added to the "stable-queue" repo [2]?
It is just to know which base I use to resolve conflicts :)
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/ [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/
I don't see any pending mptcp patches in my review mbox to process.
Thank you for having applied all these patches!
Cheers, Matt