Hello Hamza,
Thanks for the patch.
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 at 17:25, Hamza Mahfooz hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com wrote:
Recent platforms
Which platforms are you referring to here?
require more slack slots than the current value of EFI_MMAP_NR_SLACK_SLOTS, otherwise they fail to boot. So, introduce EFI_MIN_NR_MMAP_SLACK_SLOTS and EFI_MAX_NR_MMAP_SLACK_SLOTS and use them to determine a number of slots that the platform is willing to accept.
What does 'acceptance' mean in this case?
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tyler Hicks code@tyhicks.com Tested-by: Brian Nguyen nguyenbrian@microsoft.com Tested-by: Jacob Pan panj@microsoft.com Reviewed-by: Allen Pais apais@microsoft.com
I appreciate the effort of your colleagues, but if these tested/reviewed-bys were not given on an open list, they are meaningless, and I am going to drop them unless the people in question reply to this thread.
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com
drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig | 23 +++++++++++++++++ .../firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c | 2 +- drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h | 15 +---------- drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/kaslr.c | 2 +- drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/mem.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---- drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/randomalloc.c | 2 +- drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/relocate.c | 2 +- drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c | 8 +++--- 8 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
This looks rather intrusive for a patch that is intended as cc:stable.
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig index e312d731f4a3..7fedc271d543 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig @@ -155,6 +155,29 @@ config EFI_TEST Say Y here to enable the runtime services support via /dev/efi_test. If unsure, say N.
+# +# An efi_boot_memmap is used by efi_get_memory_map() to return the +# EFI memory map in a dynamically allocated buffer. +# +# The buffer allocated for the EFI memory map includes extra room for +# a range of [EFI_MIN_NR_MMAP_SLACK_SLOTS, EFI_MAX_NR_MMAP_SLACK_SLOTS] +# additional EFI memory descriptors. This facilitates the reuse of the +# EFI memory map buffer when a second call to ExitBootServices() is +# needed because of intervening changes to the EFI memory map. Other +# related structures, e.g. x86 e820ext, need to factor in this headroom +# requirement as well. +#
+config EFI_MIN_NR_MMAP_SLACK_SLOTS
int
depends on EFI
default 8
+config EFI_MAX_NR_MMAP_SLACK_SLOTS
int
depends on EFI
default 64
What would be the reason for not always bumping this to 64?
config EFI_DEV_PATH_PARSER bool
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c index c0c81ca4237e..adf2b0c0dd34 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ efi_status_t efi_exit_boot_services(void *handle, void *priv, if (efi_disable_pci_dma) efi_pci_disable_bridge_busmaster();
status = efi_get_memory_map(&map, true);
status = efi_get_memory_map(&map, true, NULL); if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) return status;
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h index 76e44c185f29..d86c6e13de5f 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h @@ -160,19 +160,6 @@ void efi_set_u64_split(u64 data, u32 *lo, u32 *hi) */ #define EFI_100NSEC_PER_USEC ((u64)10)
-/*
- An efi_boot_memmap is used by efi_get_memory_map() to return the
- EFI memory map in a dynamically allocated buffer.
- The buffer allocated for the EFI memory map includes extra room for
- a minimum of EFI_MMAP_NR_SLACK_SLOTS additional EFI memory descriptors.
- This facilitates the reuse of the EFI memory map buffer when a second
- call to ExitBootServices() is needed because of intervening changes to
- the EFI memory map. Other related structures, e.g. x86 e820ext, need
- to factor in this headroom requirement as well.
- */
-#define EFI_MMAP_NR_SLACK_SLOTS 8
typedef struct efi_generic_dev_path efi_device_path_protocol_t;
union efi_device_path_to_text_protocol { @@ -1059,7 +1046,7 @@ void efi_apply_loadoptions_quirk(const void **load_options, u32 *load_options_si char *efi_convert_cmdline(efi_loaded_image_t *image);
efi_status_t efi_get_memory_map(struct efi_boot_memmap **map,
bool install_cfg_tbl);
bool install_cfg_tbl, unsigned int *n);
efi_status_t efi_allocate_pages(unsigned long size, unsigned long *addr, unsigned long max); diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/kaslr.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/kaslr.c index 6318c40bda38..06e7a1ef34ab 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/kaslr.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/kaslr.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static bool check_image_region(u64 base, u64 size) bool ret = false; int map_offset;
status = efi_get_memory_map(&map, false);
status = efi_get_memory_map(&map, false, NULL); if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) return false;
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/mem.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/mem.c index 4f1fa302234d..cab25183b790 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/mem.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/mem.c @@ -13,32 +13,47 @@
configuration table
- Retrieve the UEFI memory map. The allocated memory leaves room for
- up to EFI_MMAP_NR_SLACK_SLOTS additional memory map entries.
*/
- up to CONFIG_EFI_MAX_NR_MMAP_SLACK_SLOTS additional memory map entries.
- Return: status code
efi_status_t efi_get_memory_map(struct efi_boot_memmap **map,
bool install_cfg_tbl)
bool install_cfg_tbl,
unsigned int *n)
What is the purpose of 'n'? Having single letter names for function parameters is not great for legibility.
{ int memtype = install_cfg_tbl ? EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY : EFI_LOADER_DATA; efi_guid_t tbl_guid = LINUX_EFI_BOOT_MEMMAP_GUID;
unsigned int nr = CONFIG_EFI_MIN_NR_MMAP_SLACK_SLOTS; struct efi_boot_memmap *m, tmp; efi_status_t status; unsigned long size;
BUILD_BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(CONFIG_EFI_MIN_NR_MMAP_SLACK_SLOTS) ||
!is_power_of_2(CONFIG_EFI_MAX_NR_MMAP_SLACK_SLOTS) ||
CONFIG_EFI_MIN_NR_MMAP_SLACK_SLOTS >=
CONFIG_EFI_MAX_NR_MMAP_SLACK_SLOTS);
tmp.map_size = 0; status = efi_bs_call(get_memory_map, &tmp.map_size, NULL, &tmp.map_key, &tmp.desc_size, &tmp.desc_ver); if (status != EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL) return EFI_LOAD_ERROR;
size = tmp.map_size + tmp.desc_size * EFI_MMAP_NR_SLACK_SLOTS;
status = efi_bs_call(allocate_pool, memtype, sizeof(*m) + size,
(void **)&m);
do {
size = tmp.map_size + tmp.desc_size * nr;
status = efi_bs_call(allocate_pool, memtype, sizeof(*m) + size,
(void **)&m);
nr <<= 1;
} while (status == EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL &&
nr <= CONFIG_EFI_MAX_NR_MMAP_SLACK_SLOTS);
Under what circumstances would you expect AllocatePool() to return EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL? What is the purpose of this loop?
How did you test this code?
if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) return status;
if (n)
*n = nr;
if (install_cfg_tbl) { /* * Installing a configuration table might allocate memory, and
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/randomalloc.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/randomalloc.c index c41e7b2091cd..e80a65e7b87a 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/randomalloc.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/randomalloc.c @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ efi_status_t efi_random_alloc(unsigned long size, efi_status_t status; int map_offset;
status = efi_get_memory_map(&map, false);
status = efi_get_memory_map(&map, false, NULL); if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) return status;
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/relocate.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/relocate.c index d694bcfa1074..b7b0aad95ba4 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/relocate.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/relocate.c @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ efi_status_t efi_low_alloc_above(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, unsigned long nr_pages; int i;
status = efi_get_memory_map(&map, false);
status = efi_get_memory_map(&map, false, NULL); if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) goto fail;
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c index 188c8000d245..cb14f0d2a3d9 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c @@ -740,15 +740,15 @@ static efi_status_t allocate_e820(struct boot_params *params, struct efi_boot_memmap *map; efi_status_t status; __u32 nr_desc;
__u32 nr;
status = efi_get_memory_map(&map, false);
status = efi_get_memory_map(&map, false, &nr); if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) return status; nr_desc = map->map_size / map->desc_size;
if (nr_desc > ARRAY_SIZE(params->e820_table) - EFI_MMAP_NR_SLACK_SLOTS) {
u32 nr_e820ext = nr_desc - ARRAY_SIZE(params->e820_table) +
EFI_MMAP_NR_SLACK_SLOTS;
if (nr_desc > ARRAY_SIZE(params->e820_table) - nr) {
u32 nr_e820ext = nr_desc - ARRAY_SIZE(params->e820_table) + nr; status = alloc_e820ext(nr_e820ext, e820ext, e820ext_size); }
-- 2.47.1