On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 05:57:01PM +0000, Sherry Yang wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 14, 2024, at 6:26 AM, Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 89fc548767a2155231128cb98726d6d2ea1256c9
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit: Backport author: Sherry Yang sherry.yang@oracle.com Commit author: Sungjong Seo sj1557.seo@samsung.com
Status in newer kernel trees: 6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: a7ac198f8dba) 6.1.y | Not found 5.15.y | Not found
I didn’t backport the commit to linux-stable-6.1.y, because 6.1.y didn’t backport the culprit commit a3ff29a95fde ("exfat: support dynamic allocate bh for exfat_entry_set_cache”), so not influenced.
However, both linux-stable-5.15.y and linux-stable-5.10.y actually backported the culprit commit. So I’m trying to fix it on 5.15.y and 5.10.y.
Let me know if you have more questions about it.
That's confusing, why doesn't 6.1.y have that commit? Shouldn't we also add it there along with this one?
thanks,
greg k-h