Hi,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 12:50:45PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Paulo,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:08:53PM -0300, Paulo Alcantara wrote:
Salvatore Bonaccorso carnil@debian.org writes:
I'm still failing to provide you a recipe with a minimal as possible setup, but with the instance I was able to reproduce the issue the regression seems gone with cherry-picking 35235e19b393 ("cifs: Replace remaining 1-element arrays") .
It's OK, no problem. Could you please provide the backport to stable team?
Sure, here it is. Greg or Sasha is it ok to pick that up for the 6.1.y queues?
Glad to, for some reason I thought this caused problems, but if it passes your testing, great! I'll go queue it up now, thanks.
Thanks! Unfortunately I'm not having a good test(case/suite) for this myself for such cases. All issues recently forwarded as regressions in the 6.1.y series were unfortunately only uncovered by Debian users once we did release the version :(. Hopefully this will "calm down" now.
Thanks to all of you, for your work!
Regards, Salvatore