From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
[ Upstream commit 7a63296d6f579a02b2675b4b0fe5b1cd3235e8d3 ]
If an ACPI power resource is found to be "on" during the initialization of the list of wakeup power resources of a device, it is reference counted and its wakeup_enabled flag is set, which is problematic if the deivce in question is the only user of the given power resource, it is never runtime-suspended and it is not allowed to wake up the system from sleep, because in that case the given power resource will stay "on" until the system reboots and energy will be wasted.
It is better to simply turn off wakeup power resources that are "on" during the initialization unless their reference counters are not zero, because that may be the only opportunity to prevent them from staying in the "on" state all the time.
Fixes: b5d667eb392e ("ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account") Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/acpi/power.c | 19 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/power.c b/drivers/acpi/power.c index f0ed4414edb1f..3d34cee0cc101 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/power.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/power.c @@ -615,20 +615,19 @@ int acpi_power_wakeup_list_init(struct list_head *list, int *system_level_p)
list_for_each_entry(entry, list, node) { struct acpi_power_resource *resource = entry->resource; - int result; u8 state;
mutex_lock(&resource->resource_lock);
- result = acpi_power_get_state(resource, &state); - if (result) { - mutex_unlock(&resource->resource_lock); - return result; - } - if (state == ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_ON) { - resource->ref_count++; - resource->wakeup_enabled = true; - } + /* + * Make sure that the power resource state and its reference + * counter value are consistent with each other. + */ + if (!resource->ref_count && + !acpi_power_get_state(resource, &state) && + state == ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_ON) + __acpi_power_off(resource); + if (system_level > resource->system_level) system_level = resource->system_level;