On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:38:03PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
In the version I tested, I also had
@@ -2216,7 +2216,7 @@ static int apply_to_pte_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
if (create) { pte = (mm == &init_mm) ?
pte_alloc_kernel(pmd, addr) :
pte_alloc_kernel_track(pmd, addr, mask) : pte_alloc_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl); if (!pte) return -ENOMEM;
And that PGTBL_PMD_MODIFIED makes a difference.
Right, thanks. Added that too.