The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 4.14-stable tree.
I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst.
I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to stable@vger.kernel.org and let me know why this patch should be applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be seen again.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 8a7a8e1eab929eb3a5b735a788a23b9731139046 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dou Liyang douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:49:04 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] timekeeping: Eliminate the stale declaration of ktime_get_raw_and_real_ts64()
Commit ba26621e63ce got rid of ktime_get_raw_and_real_ts64(), but left its declaration behind.
Remove it.
Fixes: ba26621e63ce ("time: Remove duplicated code in ktime_get_raw_and_real()") Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Cc: Christopher S. Hall christopher.s.hall@intel.com Cc: joelaf@google.com Cc: arnd@arndb.de Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org Cc: deepa.kernel@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1510552144-20831-1-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fu...
diff --git a/include/linux/timekeeping.h b/include/linux/timekeeping.h index 0021575fe871..51293e1aa4da 100644 --- a/include/linux/timekeeping.h +++ b/include/linux/timekeeping.h @@ -272,12 +272,6 @@ extern bool timekeeping_rtc_skipresume(void);
extern void timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64(struct timespec64 *delta);
-/* - * PPS accessor - */ -extern void ktime_get_raw_and_real_ts64(struct timespec64 *ts_raw, - struct timespec64 *ts_real); - /* * struct system_time_snapshot - simultaneous raw/real time capture with * counter value