From: Chuck Lever chuck.lever@oracle.com
[ Upstream commit 043862b09cc00273e35e6c3a6389957953a34207 ]
And return explicit nfserr values that match what is documented in the new comment / API contract.
Stable-dep-of: edcf9725150e ("nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER") Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever chuck.lever@oracle.com --- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c index 9a77a3eac4ac..0dfc45d37658 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -6867,6 +6867,23 @@ check_for_locks(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lowner) return status; }
+/** + * nfsd4_release_lockowner - process NFSv4.0 RELEASE_LOCKOWNER operations + * @rqstp: RPC transaction + * @cstate: NFSv4 COMPOUND state + * @u: RELEASE_LOCKOWNER arguments + * + * The lockowner's so_count is bumped when a lock record is added + * or when copying a conflicting lock. The latter case is brief, + * but can lead to fleeting false positives when looking for + * locks-in-use. + * + * Return values: + * %nfs_ok: lockowner released or not found + * %nfserr_locks_held: lockowner still in use + * %nfserr_stale_clientid: clientid no longer active + * %nfserr_expired: clientid not recognized + */ __be32 nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, @@ -6893,7 +6910,7 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, lo = find_lockowner_str_locked(clp, &rlockowner->rl_owner); if (!lo) { spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock); - return status; + return nfs_ok; } if (atomic_read(&lo->lo_owner.so_count) != 2) { spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock); @@ -6909,11 +6926,11 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, put_ol_stateid_locked(stp, &reaplist); } spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock); + free_ol_stateid_reaplist(&reaplist); remove_blocked_locks(lo); nfs4_put_stateowner(&lo->lo_owner); - - return status; + return nfs_ok; }
static inline struct nfs4_client_reclaim *