From: James Smart jsmart2021@gmail.com
commit c26aa572027d438de9cc311aaebcbe972f698c24 upstream.
Current code matches subnqn and collapses all controllers to the same subnqn to a single subsystem structure. This is good for recognizing multiple controllers for the same subsystem. But with the well-known discovery subnqn, the subsystems aren't truly the same subsystem. As such, subsystem specific rules, such as no overlap of controller id, do not apply. With today's behavior, the check for overlap of controller id can fail, preventing the new discovery controller from being created.
When searching for like subsystem nqn, exclude the discovery nqn from matching. This will result in each discovery controller being attached to a unique subsystem structure.
Signed-off-by: James Smart jsmart2021@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg sagi@grimberg.me Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy maxg@mellanox.com Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg sagi@grimberg.me Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c @@ -2200,6 +2200,17 @@ static struct nvme_subsystem *__nvme_fin
lockdep_assert_held(&nvme_subsystems_lock);
+ /* + * Fail matches for discovery subsystems. This results + * in each discovery controller bound to a unique subsystem. + * This avoids issues with validating controller values + * that can only be true when there is a single unique subsystem. + * There may be multiple and completely independent entities + * that provide discovery controllers. + */ + if (!strcmp(subsysnqn, NVME_DISC_SUBSYS_NAME)) + return NULL; + list_for_each_entry(subsys, &nvme_subsystems, entry) { if (strcmp(subsys->subnqn, subsysnqn)) continue;