5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Martin KaFai Lau martin.lau@kernel.org
[ Upstream commit ee9fd0ac3017c4313be91a220a9ac4c99dde7ad4 ]
KCSAN reported a data-race when accessing node->ref. Although node->ref does not have to be accurate, take this chance to use a more common READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() pattern instead of data_race().
There is an existing bpf_lru_node_is_ref() and bpf_lru_node_set_ref(). This patch also adds bpf_lru_node_clear_ref() to do the WRITE_ONCE(node->ref, 0) also.
================================================================== BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __bpf_lru_list_rotate / __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem
write to 0xffff888137038deb of 1 bytes by task 11240 on cpu 1: __bpf_lru_node_move kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:113 [inline] __bpf_lru_list_rotate_active kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:149 [inline] __bpf_lru_list_rotate+0x1bf/0x750 kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:240 bpf_lru_list_pop_free_to_local kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:329 [inline] bpf_common_lru_pop_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:447 [inline] bpf_lru_pop_free+0x638/0xe20 kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:499 prealloc_lru_pop kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:290 [inline] __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem+0xe7/0x820 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1316 bpf_percpu_hash_update+0x5e/0x90 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:2313 bpf_map_update_value+0x2a9/0x370 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:200 generic_map_update_batch+0x3ae/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1687 bpf_map_do_batch+0x2d9/0x3d0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4534 __sys_bpf+0x338/0x810 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5096 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5094 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x43/0x50 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5094 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
read to 0xffff888137038deb of 1 bytes by task 11241 on cpu 0: bpf_lru_node_set_ref kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h:70 [inline] __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem+0x2f1/0x820 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1332 bpf_percpu_hash_update+0x5e/0x90 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:2313 bpf_map_update_value+0x2a9/0x370 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:200 generic_map_update_batch+0x3ae/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1687 bpf_map_do_batch+0x2d9/0x3d0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4534 __sys_bpf+0x338/0x810 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5096 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5094 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x43/0x50 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5094 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
value changed: 0x01 -> 0x00
Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 0 PID: 11241 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7-syzkaller-00136-g6a66fdd29ea1 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/30/2023 ==================================================================
Reported-by: syzbot+ebe648a84e8784763f82@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau martin.lau@kernel.org Acked-by: Yonghong Song yhs@fb.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230511043748.1384166-1-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h | 7 ++----- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c index d99e89f113c43..3dabdd137d102 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c @@ -41,7 +41,12 @@ static struct list_head *local_pending_list(struct bpf_lru_locallist *loc_l) /* bpf_lru_node helpers */ static bool bpf_lru_node_is_ref(const struct bpf_lru_node *node) { - return node->ref; + return READ_ONCE(node->ref); +} + +static void bpf_lru_node_clear_ref(struct bpf_lru_node *node) +{ + WRITE_ONCE(node->ref, 0); }
static void bpf_lru_list_count_inc(struct bpf_lru_list *l, @@ -89,7 +94,7 @@ static void __bpf_lru_node_move_in(struct bpf_lru_list *l,
bpf_lru_list_count_inc(l, tgt_type); node->type = tgt_type; - node->ref = 0; + bpf_lru_node_clear_ref(node); list_move(&node->list, &l->lists[tgt_type]); }
@@ -110,7 +115,7 @@ static void __bpf_lru_node_move(struct bpf_lru_list *l, bpf_lru_list_count_inc(l, tgt_type); node->type = tgt_type; } - node->ref = 0; + bpf_lru_node_clear_ref(node);
/* If the moving node is the next_inactive_rotation candidate, * move the next_inactive_rotation pointer also. @@ -353,7 +358,7 @@ static void __local_list_add_pending(struct bpf_lru *lru, *(u32 *)((void *)node + lru->hash_offset) = hash; node->cpu = cpu; node->type = BPF_LRU_LOCAL_LIST_T_PENDING; - node->ref = 0; + bpf_lru_node_clear_ref(node); list_add(&node->list, local_pending_list(loc_l)); }
@@ -419,7 +424,7 @@ static struct bpf_lru_node *bpf_percpu_lru_pop_free(struct bpf_lru *lru, if (!list_empty(free_list)) { node = list_first_entry(free_list, struct bpf_lru_node, list); *(u32 *)((void *)node + lru->hash_offset) = hash; - node->ref = 0; + bpf_lru_node_clear_ref(node); __bpf_lru_node_move(l, node, BPF_LRU_LIST_T_INACTIVE); }
@@ -522,7 +527,7 @@ static void bpf_common_lru_push_free(struct bpf_lru *lru, }
node->type = BPF_LRU_LOCAL_LIST_T_FREE; - node->ref = 0; + bpf_lru_node_clear_ref(node); list_move(&node->list, local_free_list(loc_l));
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&loc_l->lock, flags); @@ -568,7 +573,7 @@ static void bpf_common_lru_populate(struct bpf_lru *lru, void *buf,
node = (struct bpf_lru_node *)(buf + node_offset); node->type = BPF_LRU_LIST_T_FREE; - node->ref = 0; + bpf_lru_node_clear_ref(node); list_add(&node->list, &l->lists[BPF_LRU_LIST_T_FREE]); buf += elem_size; } @@ -594,7 +599,7 @@ static void bpf_percpu_lru_populate(struct bpf_lru *lru, void *buf, node = (struct bpf_lru_node *)(buf + node_offset); node->cpu = cpu; node->type = BPF_LRU_LIST_T_FREE; - node->ref = 0; + bpf_lru_node_clear_ref(node); list_add(&node->list, &l->lists[BPF_LRU_LIST_T_FREE]); i++; buf += elem_size; diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h index 6b12f06ee18c3..9c12ee453c616 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h @@ -63,11 +63,8 @@ struct bpf_lru {
static inline void bpf_lru_node_set_ref(struct bpf_lru_node *node) { - /* ref is an approximation on access frequency. It does not - * have to be very accurate. Hence, no protection is used. - */ - if (!node->ref) - node->ref = 1; + if (!READ_ONCE(node->ref)) + WRITE_ONCE(node->ref, 1); }
int bpf_lru_init(struct bpf_lru *lru, bool percpu, u32 hash_offset,