6.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
commit d283ee5662c6bf2f3771a36b926f6988e6dddfc6 upstream.
Make the log easier to parse by including the name of the PLL in the debug prints regarding said PLL.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240123093137.9133-1-ville.sy... Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula jani.nikula@intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 39 +++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c @@ -4476,25 +4476,25 @@ verify_single_dpll_state(struct drm_i915 u8 pipe_mask; bool active;
- drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "%s\n", pll->info->name); - active = intel_dpll_get_hw_state(i915, pll, &dpll_hw_state);
if (!(pll->info->flags & INTEL_DPLL_ALWAYS_ON)) { I915_STATE_WARN(i915, !pll->on && pll->active_mask, - "pll in active use but not on in sw tracking\n"); + "%s: pll in active use but not on in sw tracking\n", + pll->info->name); I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->on && !pll->active_mask, - "pll is on but not used by any active pipe\n"); + "%s: pll is on but not used by any active pipe\n", + pll->info->name); I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->on != active, - "pll on state mismatch (expected %i, found %i)\n", - pll->on, active); + "%s: pll on state mismatch (expected %i, found %i)\n", + pll->info->name, pll->on, active); }
if (!crtc) { I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->active_mask & ~pll->state.pipe_mask, - "more active pll users than references: 0x%x vs 0x%x\n", - pll->active_mask, pll->state.pipe_mask); + "%s: more active pll users than references: 0x%x vs 0x%x\n", + pll->info->name, pll->active_mask, pll->state.pipe_mask);
return; } @@ -4503,21 +4503,22 @@ verify_single_dpll_state(struct drm_i915
if (new_crtc_state->hw.active) I915_STATE_WARN(i915, !(pll->active_mask & pipe_mask), - "pll active mismatch (expected pipe %c in active mask 0x%x)\n", - pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask); + "%s: pll active mismatch (expected pipe %c in active mask 0x%x)\n", + pll->info->name, pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask); else I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->active_mask & pipe_mask, - "pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask 0x%x)\n", - pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask); + "%s: pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask 0x%x)\n", + pll->info->name, pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
I915_STATE_WARN(i915, !(pll->state.pipe_mask & pipe_mask), - "pll enabled crtcs mismatch (expected 0x%x in 0x%x)\n", - pipe_mask, pll->state.pipe_mask); + "%s: pll enabled crtcs mismatch (expected 0x%x in 0x%x)\n", + pll->info->name, pipe_mask, pll->state.pipe_mask);
I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->on && memcmp(&pll->state.hw_state, &dpll_hw_state, sizeof(dpll_hw_state)), - "pll hw state mismatch\n"); + "%s: pll hw state mismatch\n", + pll->info->name); }
void intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(struct intel_atomic_state *state, @@ -4539,11 +4540,11 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(stru struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = old_crtc_state->shared_dpll;
I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->active_mask & pipe_mask, - "pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask (0x%x))\n", - pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask); + "%s: pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask (0x%x))\n", + pll->info->name, pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask); I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->state.pipe_mask & pipe_mask, - "pll enabled crtcs mismatch (found pipe %c in enabled mask (0x%x))\n", - pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->state.pipe_mask); + "%s: pll enabled crtcs mismatch (found pipe %c in enabled mask (0x%x))\n", + pll->info->name, pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->state.pipe_mask); } }