5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sergey Shtylyov s.shtylyov@omp.ru
commit ecfe9a015d3e1e46504d5b3de7eef1f2d186194a upstream.
pinctrl_register_one_pin() doesn't check the result of radix_tree_insert() despite they both may return a negative error code. Linus Walleij said he has copied the radix tree code from kernel/irq/ where the functions calling radix_tree_insert() are *void* themselves; I think it makes more sense to propagate the errors from radix_tree_insert() upstream if we can do that...
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the Svace static analysis tool.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov s.shtylyov@omp.ru Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230719202253.13469-3-s.shtylyov@omp.ru Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org Cc: "Hemdan, Hagar Gamal Halim" hagarhem@amazon.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 14 +++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c @@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ static int pinctrl_register_one_pin(stru const struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pin) { struct pin_desc *pindesc; + int error;
pindesc = pin_desc_get(pctldev, pin->number); if (pindesc) { @@ -226,18 +227,25 @@ static int pinctrl_register_one_pin(stru } else { pindesc->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "PIN%u", pin->number); if (!pindesc->name) { - kfree(pindesc); - return -ENOMEM; + error = -ENOMEM; + goto failed; } pindesc->dynamic_name = true; }
pindesc->drv_data = pin->drv_data;
- radix_tree_insert(&pctldev->pin_desc_tree, pin->number, pindesc); + error = radix_tree_insert(&pctldev->pin_desc_tree, pin->number, pindesc); + if (error) + goto failed; + pr_debug("registered pin %d (%s) on %s\n", pin->number, pindesc->name, pctldev->desc->name); return 0; + +failed: + kfree(pindesc); + return error; }
static int pinctrl_register_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,