The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 57e2c2f2d94cfd551af91cedfa1af6d972487197 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to 'stable@vger.kernel.org' --in-reply-to '2023072126-unread-chokehold-f312@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
57e2c2f2d94c ("fs: dlm: fix mismatch of plock results from userspace") c847f4e20304 ("fs: dlm: fix cleanup pending ops when interrupted") b92a4e3f86b1 ("fs: dlm: change posix lock sigint handling") 4d413ae9ced4 ("fs: dlm: use dlm_plock_info for do_unlock_close") ea06d4cabf52 ("fs: dlm: change plock interrupted message to debug again") 19d7ca051d30 ("fs: dlm: add pid to debug log") dc1acd5c9469 ("dlm: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable") bcfad4265ced ("dlm: improve plock logging if interrupted") a800ba77fd28 ("dlm: rearrange async condition return") bcbb4ba6c9ba ("dlm: cleanup plock_op vs plock_xop") a559790caa1c ("dlm: replace sanity checks with WARN_ON") 42252d0d2aa9 ("dlm: fix plock invalid read") b065b23d3c3b ("dt-bindings: clock: Add ipq9574 clock and reset definitions") b065b23d3c3b ("dt-bindings: clock: Add ipq9574 clock and reset definitions") b065b23d3c3b ("dt-bindings: clock: Add ipq9574 clock and reset definitions") b065b23d3c3b ("dt-bindings: clock: Add ipq9574 clock and reset definitions") b065b23d3c3b ("dt-bindings: clock: Add ipq9574 clock and reset definitions") b065b23d3c3b ("dt-bindings: clock: Add ipq9574 clock and reset definitions") b065b23d3c3b ("dt-bindings: clock: Add ipq9574 clock and reset definitions") b065b23d3c3b ("dt-bindings: clock: Add ipq9574 clock and reset definitions")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 57e2c2f2d94cfd551af91cedfa1af6d972487197 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Aring aahringo@redhat.com Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 12:02:04 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fs: dlm: fix mismatch of plock results from userspace
When a waiting plock request (F_SETLKW) is sent to userspace for processing (dlm_controld), the result is returned at a later time. That result could be incorrectly matched to a different waiting request in cases where the owner field is the same (e.g. different threads in a process.) This is fixed by comparing all the properties in the request and reply.
The results for non-waiting plock requests are now matched based on list order because the results are returned in the same order they were sent.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring aahringo@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Teigland teigland@redhat.com
diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c index c9e1d5f54194..70a4752ed913 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/plock.c +++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ static ssize_t dev_read(struct file *file, char __user *u, size_t count, if (op->info.flags & DLM_PLOCK_FL_CLOSE) list_del(&op->list); else - list_move(&op->list, &recv_list); + list_move_tail(&op->list, &recv_list); memcpy(&info, &op->info, sizeof(info)); } spin_unlock(&ops_lock); @@ -433,20 +433,52 @@ static ssize_t dev_write(struct file *file, const char __user *u, size_t count, if (check_version(&info)) return -EINVAL;
+ /* + * The results for waiting ops (SETLKW) can be returned in any + * order, so match all fields to find the op. The results for + * non-waiting ops are returned in the order that they were sent + * to userspace, so match the result with the first non-waiting op. + */ spin_lock(&ops_lock); - list_for_each_entry(iter, &recv_list, list) { - if (iter->info.fsid == info.fsid && - iter->info.number == info.number && - iter->info.owner == info.owner) { - list_del_init(&iter->list); - memcpy(&iter->info, &info, sizeof(info)); - if (iter->data) - do_callback = 1; - else - iter->done = 1; - op = iter; - break; + if (info.wait) { + list_for_each_entry(iter, &recv_list, list) { + if (iter->info.fsid == info.fsid && + iter->info.number == info.number && + iter->info.owner == info.owner && + iter->info.pid == info.pid && + iter->info.start == info.start && + iter->info.end == info.end && + iter->info.ex == info.ex && + iter->info.wait) { + op = iter; + break; + } } + } else { + list_for_each_entry(iter, &recv_list, list) { + if (!iter->info.wait) { + op = iter; + break; + } + } + } + + if (op) { + /* Sanity check that op and info match. */ + if (info.wait) + WARN_ON(op->info.optype != DLM_PLOCK_OP_LOCK); + else + WARN_ON(op->info.fsid != info.fsid || + op->info.number != info.number || + op->info.owner != info.owner || + op->info.optype != info.optype); + + list_del_init(&op->list); + memcpy(&op->info, &info, sizeof(info)); + if (op->data) + do_callback = 1; + else + op->done = 1; } spin_unlock(&ops_lock);