From: Maor Gottlieb maorg@mellanox.com
[ Upstream commit 987f6c69dd923069d443f6a37225f5b1630a30f2 ]
New flow table type RDMA_RX was added but the MLX5_CAP_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE didn't handle this new flow table type. This means that MLX5_CAP_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE returns an empty capability to this flow table type.
Update both the macro and the maximum supported flow table type to RDMA_RX.
Fixes: d83eb50e29de ("net/mlx5: Add support in RDMA RX steering") Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb maorg@mellanox.com Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed saeedm@mellanox.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.h | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.h @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ enum fs_flow_table_type { FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX = 0X5, FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX = 0X6, FS_FT_RDMA_RX = 0X7, - FS_FT_MAX_TYPE = FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX, + FS_FT_MAX_TYPE = FS_FT_RDMA_RX, };
enum fs_flow_table_op_mod { @@ -274,7 +274,8 @@ void mlx5_cleanup_fs(struct mlx5_core_de (type == FS_FT_FDB) ? MLX5_CAP_ESW_FLOWTABLE_FDB(mdev, cap) : \ (type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_RX(mdev, cap) : \ (type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_TX(mdev, cap) : \ - (BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX != FS_FT_MAX_TYPE))\ + (type == FS_FT_RDMA_RX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_RDMA_RX(mdev, cap) : \ + (BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(FS_FT_RDMA_RX != FS_FT_MAX_TYPE))\ )
#endif