6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yujie Liu yujie.liu@intel.com
[ Upstream commit f032c53bea6d2057c14553832d846be2f151cfb2 ]
The order of descriptions should be consistent with the argument list of the function, so "kretprobe" should be the second one.
int __kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start(struct dynevent_cmd *cmd, bool kretprobe, const char *name, const char *loc, ...)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231031041305.3363712-1-yujie.liu@intel.com/
Fixes: 2a588dd1d5d6 ("tracing: Add kprobe event command generation functions") Suggested-by: Mukesh Ojha quic_mojha@quicinc.com Signed-off-by: Yujie Liu yujie.liu@intel.com Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha quic_mojha@quicinc.com Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) mhiramat@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c index e834f149695b7..47812aa16bb57 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c @@ -1020,9 +1020,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kprobe_event_cmd_init); /** * __kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start - Generate a kprobe event command from arg list * @cmd: A pointer to the dynevent_cmd struct representing the new event + * @kretprobe: Is this a return probe? * @name: The name of the kprobe event * @loc: The location of the kprobe event - * @kretprobe: Is this a return probe? * @...: Variable number of arg (pairs), one pair for each field * * NOTE: Users normally won't want to call this function directly, but