On 23.03.21 16:21, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:16:18 +0100 Christian Borntraeger borntraeger@de.ibm.com wrote:
On 23.03.21 16:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 23.03.21 16:07, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 22.03.21 15:05, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
Prefixing needs to be applied to the guest real address to translate it into a guest absolute address.
The value of MSO needs to be added to a guest-absolute address in order to obtain the host-virtual.
Fixes: 223ea46de9e79 ("s390/kvm: VSIE: correctly handle MVPG when in VSIE") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda imbrenda@linux.ibm.com Reported-by: Janosch Frank frankja@linux.ibm.com
arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c index 48aab6290a77..ac86f11e46dc 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c @@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ static u64 vsie_get_register(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page, static int vsie_handle_mvpg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page) { struct kvm_s390_sie_block *scb_s = &vsie_page->scb_s; - unsigned long pei_dest, pei_src, src, dest, mask; + unsigned long pei_dest, pei_src, dest, src, mask, mso, prefix; u64 *pei_block = &vsie_page->scb_o->mcic; int edat, rc_dest, rc_src; union ctlreg0 cr0; @@ -1010,9 +1010,13 @@ static int vsie_handle_mvpg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page) cr0.val = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0]; edat = cr0.edat && test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 8); mask = _kvm_s390_logical_to_effective(&scb_s->gpsw, PAGE_MASK); + mso = scb_s->mso & ~(1UL << 20);
shouldnt that be ~((1UL << 20 ) -1)
oops
Looking at shadow_scb(), we can simply take scb_s->mso unmodified.
Right, I think I can fix this up (and get rid of the local mso
I think that's easier/simpler
variable) when queueing. Or shall Claudio send a new version of the patch?
queued (with fixup). Please note: can you use "KVM: s390:" instead of "s390/kvm" for the future patches.