Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: process: replace outdated LTS table w/ link

On 10/18/22 07:04, Nick Desaulniers wrote:

...

Should this patch be backported to all stable releases? I see Cc: stable on message header, but not in the patch trailer.

I don't think so; unless people read stable versions of the documentation rather than HEAD? Perhaps I didn't need to cc stable, but I think that's ok for notifying people who are interested in stable, not necessarily strictly for backports? Either way, thanks again for the reviews+suggestions.

I think most people will simply read the documentation from master branch (as in docs.kernel.org).

Thanks.