4 Jul
2019
4 Jul
'19
7:55 p.m.
This is correct but missing that the above 'return ret' is broken, too. ret is initialized but 0 in that case.
Nice catch! Oh well, given enough eyeballs, ...
I don't think ret is initialized, reg is, not ret .
It is initialized for the broken 'return ret' *above* the one which gets rightfully fixed in this patch.