On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 4:07 PM Ian Forbes ian.forbes@broadcom.com wrote:
Legacy DU was broken by the referenced fixes commit because the placement and the busy_placement no longer pointed to the same object. This was later fixed indirectly by commit a78a8da51b36c7a0c0c16233f91d60aac03a5a49 ("drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v6") in v6.9.
Fixes: 39985eea5a6d ("drm/vmwgfx: Abstract placement selection") Signed-off-by: Ian Forbes ian.forbes@broadcom.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.4+
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c index 2bfac3aad7b7..98e73eb0ccf1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ int vmw_bo_pin_in_start_of_vram(struct vmw_private *dev_priv, VMW_BO_DOMAIN_VRAM, VMW_BO_DOMAIN_VRAM); buf->places[0].lpfn = PFN_UP(bo->resource->size);
buf->busy_places[0].lpfn = PFN_UP(bo->resource->size); ret = ttm_bo_validate(bo, &buf->placement, &ctx); /* For some reason we didn't end up at the start of vram */
Looks great. I'll push it through drm-misc-fixes. Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin zack.rusin@broadcom.com
z