6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: John Kacur jkacur@redhat.com
commit 01b05fc0e5f3aec443a9a8ffa0022cbca2fd3608 upstream.
On short runs it is possible to get no samples on a cpu, like this:
# rtla timerlat hist -u -T50
Index IRQ-001 Thr-001 Usr-001 IRQ-002 Thr-002 Usr-002 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 1 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 1 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 1 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 1 0 over: 0 0 0 0 0 0 count: 1 1 1 1 1 0 min: 2 33 36 49 52 18446744073709551615 avg: 2 33 36 49 52 - max: 2 33 36 49 52 0 rtla timerlat hit stop tracing IRQ handler delay: (exit from idle) 48.21 us (91.09 %) IRQ latency: 49.11 us Timerlat IRQ duration: 2.17 us (4.09 %) Blocking thread: 1.01 us (1.90 %) swapper/2:0 1.01 us ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thread latency: 52.93 us (100%)
Max timerlat IRQ latency from idle: 49.11 us in cpu 2
Note, the value 18446744073709551615 is the same as ~0.
Fix this by reporting no results for the min, avg and max if the count is 0.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240510190318.44295-1-jkacur@redhat.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 1eeb6328e8b3 ("rtla/timerlat: Add timerlat hist mode") Suggested-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveria bristot@kernel.org Signed-off-by: John Kacur jkacur@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira bristot@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c +++ b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c @@ -323,17 +323,29 @@ timerlat_print_summary(struct timerlat_h if (!data->hist[cpu].irq_count && !data->hist[cpu].thread_count) continue;
- if (!params->no_irq) - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", - data->hist[cpu].min_irq); - - if (!params->no_thread) - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", - data->hist[cpu].min_thread); - - if (params->user_hist) - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", - data->hist[cpu].min_user); + if (!params->no_irq) { + if (data->hist[cpu].irq_count) + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", + data->hist[cpu].min_irq); + else + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, " - "); + } + + if (!params->no_thread) { + if (data->hist[cpu].thread_count) + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", + data->hist[cpu].min_thread); + else + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, " - "); + } + + if (params->user_hist) { + if (data->hist[cpu].user_count) + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", + data->hist[cpu].min_user); + else + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, " - "); + } } trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "\n");
@@ -383,17 +395,29 @@ timerlat_print_summary(struct timerlat_h if (!data->hist[cpu].irq_count && !data->hist[cpu].thread_count) continue;
- if (!params->no_irq) - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", - data->hist[cpu].max_irq); - - if (!params->no_thread) - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", - data->hist[cpu].max_thread); - - if (params->user_hist) - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", - data->hist[cpu].max_user); + if (!params->no_irq) { + if (data->hist[cpu].irq_count) + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", + data->hist[cpu].max_irq); + else + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, " - "); + } + + if (!params->no_thread) { + if (data->hist[cpu].thread_count) + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", + data->hist[cpu].max_thread); + else + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, " - "); + } + + if (params->user_hist) { + if (data->hist[cpu].user_count) + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", + data->hist[cpu].max_user); + else + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, " - "); + } } trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "\n"); trace_seq_do_printf(trace->seq);