6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tomas Glozar tglozar@redhat.com
commit 76b3102148135945b013797fac9b206273f0f777 upstream.
Do the same fix as in previous commit also for timerlat-hist.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241011121015.2868751-2-tglozar@redhat.com Reported-by: Attila Fazekas afazekas@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Tomas Glozar tglozar@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) rostedt@goodmis.org [ Drop hunk fixing printf in timerlat_print_stats_all since that is not in 6.6 ] Signed-off-by: Tomas Glozar tglozar@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c +++ b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c @@ -58,9 +58,9 @@ struct timerlat_hist_cpu { int *thread; int *user;
- int irq_count; - int thread_count; - int user_count; + unsigned long long irq_count; + unsigned long long thread_count; + unsigned long long user_count;
unsigned long long min_irq; unsigned long long sum_irq; @@ -300,15 +300,15 @@ timerlat_print_summary(struct timerlat_h continue;
if (!params->no_irq) - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ", + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", data->hist[cpu].irq_count);
if (!params->no_thread) - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ", + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", data->hist[cpu].thread_count);
if (params->user_hist) - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ", + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", data->hist[cpu].user_count); } trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "\n");