From: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com
[ Upstream commit 6f7de19ed3d4d3526ca5eca428009f97cf969c2f ]
Commit ff3d27a048d9 ("btrfs: qgroup: Finish rescan when hit the last leaf of extent tree") added a new exit for rescan finish.
However after finishing quota rescan, we set fs_info->qgroup_rescan_progress to (u64)-1 before we exit through the original exit path. While we missed that assignment of (u64)-1 in the new exit path.
The end result is, the quota status item doesn't have the same value. (-1 vs the last bytenr + 1) Although it doesn't affect quota accounting, it's still better to keep the original behavior.
Reported-by: Misono Tomohiro misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com Fixes: ff3d27a048d9 ("btrfs: qgroup: Finish rescan when hit the last leaf of extent tree") Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com Reviewed-by: Misono Tomohiro misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c index 473ad5985aa3..47dec283628d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c @@ -2603,8 +2603,10 @@ qgroup_rescan_leaf(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct btrfs_path *path, } btrfs_put_tree_mod_seq(fs_info, &tree_mod_seq_elem);
- if (done && !ret) + if (done && !ret) { ret = 1; + fs_info->qgroup_rescan_progress.objectid = (u64)-1; + } return ret; }