4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit d7263ab35be25505ab57ebecd93cbc5dba8be717 ]
In Spectrum-2, higher priority value wins and priority valid values are in the range of {1,cap_kvd_size-1}. mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_priority_get converts from lower-bound priorities alike tc flower to Spectrum-2 HW range. Up until now tc flower did not provide priority 0 or reached the maximal value, however multicast routing does provide priority 0.
Therefore, Change mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_priority_get to verify priority is in the correct range. Make sure priority is never set to zero and never exceeds the maximal allowed value.
Signed-off-by: Nir Dotan nird@mellanox.com Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko jiri@mellanox.com Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel idosch@mellanox.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c index e171513bb32a..30931a2c025b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c @@ -95,8 +95,9 @@ int mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_priority_get(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, if (!MLXSW_CORE_RES_VALID(mlxsw_sp->core, KVD_SIZE)) return -EIO;
- max_priority = MLXSW_CORE_RES_GET(mlxsw_sp->core, KVD_SIZE); - if (rulei->priority > max_priority) + /* Priority range is 1..cap_kvd_size-1. */ + max_priority = MLXSW_CORE_RES_GET(mlxsw_sp->core, KVD_SIZE) - 1; + if (rulei->priority >= max_priority) return -EINVAL;
/* Unlike in TC, in HW, higher number means higher priority. */