6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz
[ Upstream commit a662f3c03b754e1f97a2781fa242e95bdb139798 ]
If a journal is wiped, we will set journal->j_tail to 0. However if 'write' argument is not set (as it happens for read-only device or for ocfs2), the on-disk superblock is not updated accordingly and thus jbd2_journal_recover() cat try to recover the wiped journal. Fix the check in jbd2_journal_recover() to use journal->j_tail for checking empty journal instead.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi yi.zhang@huawei.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250206094657.20865-4-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/jbd2/recovery.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/recovery.c b/fs/jbd2/recovery.c index 667f67342c522..f85f401526c54 100644 --- a/fs/jbd2/recovery.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/recovery.c @@ -287,19 +287,20 @@ static int fc_do_one_pass(journal_t *journal, int jbd2_journal_recover(journal_t *journal) { int err, err2; - journal_superblock_t * sb; - struct recovery_info info;
memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info)); - sb = journal->j_superblock;
/* * The journal superblock's s_start field (the current log head) * is always zero if, and only if, the journal was cleanly - * unmounted. + * unmounted. We use its in-memory version j_tail here because + * jbd2_journal_wipe() could have updated it without updating journal + * superblock. */ - if (!sb->s_start) { + if (!journal->j_tail) { + journal_superblock_t *sb = journal->j_superblock; + jbd2_debug(1, "No recovery required, last transaction %d, head block %u\n", be32_to_cpu(sb->s_sequence), be32_to_cpu(sb->s_head)); journal->j_transaction_sequence = be32_to_cpu(sb->s_sequence) + 1;