Verma, Vishal L wrote:
On Tue, 2022-06-28 at 14:42 -0700, Alison Schofield wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 01:04:27PM -0700, Vishal Verma wrote:
The conversion of command sizes to unsigned missed a couple of checks against variable size payloads during command validation, which made all variable payload commands unconditionally fail. Add the checks back using the new CXL_VARIABLE_PAYLOAD scheme.
Reported-by: Abhi Cs abhi.cs@intel.com Fixes: 26f89535a5bb ("cxl/mbox: Use type __u32 for mailbox payload sizes") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ira Weiny ira.weiny@intel.com Cc: Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com Cc: Alison Schofield alison.schofield@intel.com Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma vishal.l.verma@intel.com
with one caveat below... Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield alison.schofield@intel.com
Thanks for the review!
drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c index 40e3ccb2bf3e..d929b89d12a7 100644 --- a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c @@ -355,12 +355,14 @@ static int cxl_to_mem_cmd(struct cxl_mem_command *mem_cmd, return -EBUSY; /* Check the input buffer is the expected size */ - if (info->size_in != send_cmd->in.size) - return -ENOMEM; + if (info->size_in != CXL_VARIABLE_PAYLOAD) + if (info->size_in != send_cmd->in.size) + return -ENOMEM;
We can leave it to Dan to arbitrate, but I don't think nested if's without brackets follow kernel coding style.
However, Dan didn't like my nested if's with brackets either. He'd prefer using &&
Ha funny - I had && originally, but then I spotted nested if () a few lines above in the same file in cxl_mbox_send_cmd(), and switched to the same style :)
I'd be happy to change to &&.
Yeah, lets go that route.
/me thanks Alison for catching it.