From: Luca Coelho luciano.coelho@intel.com
[ Upstream commit 5a6842455c113920001df83cffa28accceeb0927 ]
The value we receive from ACPI is a long long unsigned integer but the values should be treated as signed char. When comparing the received value with ACPI_PPAG_MIN_LB/HB, we were doing an unsigned comparison, so the negative value would actually be treated as a very high number.
To solve this issue, assign the value to our table of s8's before making the comparison, so the value is already converted when we do so.
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho luciano.coelho@intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210210135352.b0ec69f312bc.If77fd9c61a96a... Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho luciano.coelho@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/fw.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/fw.c index 9e150c01f7b37..522d547f35d58 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/fw.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/fw.c @@ -962,16 +962,23 @@ read_table: union acpi_object *ent;
ent = &wifi_pkg->package.elements[idx++]; - if (ent->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER || - (j == 0 && ent->integer.value > ACPI_PPAG_MAX_LB) || - (j == 0 && ent->integer.value < ACPI_PPAG_MIN_LB) || - (j != 0 && ent->integer.value > ACPI_PPAG_MAX_HB) || - (j != 0 && ent->integer.value < ACPI_PPAG_MIN_HB)) { - ppag_table.v1.enabled = cpu_to_le32(0); + if (ent->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) { ret = -EINVAL; goto out_free; } + gain[i * num_sub_bands + j] = ent->integer.value; + + if ((j == 0 && + (gain[i * num_sub_bands + j] > ACPI_PPAG_MAX_LB || + gain[i * num_sub_bands + j] < ACPI_PPAG_MIN_LB)) || + (j != 0 && + (gain[i * num_sub_bands + j] > ACPI_PPAG_MAX_HB || + gain[i * num_sub_bands + j] < ACPI_PPAG_MIN_HB))) { + ppag_table.v1.enabled = cpu_to_le32(0); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out_free; + } } } ret = 0;