6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Moshe Shemesh moshe@nvidia.com
[ Upstream commit eab0da38912ebdad922ed0388209f7eb0a5163cd ]
Due to the cited patch, devlink health commands take devlink lock and this may result in deadlock for mlx5e_tx_reporter as it takes local state_lock before calling devlink health report and on the other hand devlink health commands such as diagnose for same reporter take local state_lock after taking devlink lock (see kernel log below).
To fix it, remove local state_lock from mlx5e_tx_timeout_work() before calling devlink_health_report() and take care to cancel the work before any call to close channels, which may free the SQs that should be handled by the work. Before cancel_work_sync(), use current_work() to check we are not calling it from within the work, as mlx5e_tx_timeout_work() itself may close the channels and reopen as part of recovery flow.
While removing state_lock from mlx5e_tx_timeout_work() keep rtnl_lock to ensure no change in netdev->real_num_tx_queues, but use rtnl_trylock() and a flag to avoid deadlock by calling cancel_work_sync() before closing the channels while holding rtnl_lock too.
Kernel log: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.0.0-rc3_for_upstream_debug_2022_08_30_13_10 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u16:2/65 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888122f6c2f8 (&devlink->lock_key#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0
but task is already holding lock: ffff888121d20be0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x70/0x280 [mlx5_core]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x12c/0x14b0 mlx5e_rx_reporter_diagnose+0x71/0x700 [mlx5_core] devlink_nl_cmd_health_reporter_diagnose_doit+0x212/0xa50 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x1e9/0x2f0 genl_rcv_msg+0x2e9/0x530 netlink_rcv_skb+0x11d/0x340 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x438/0x710 netlink_sendmsg+0x788/0xc40 sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xe0 __sys_sendto+0x1c1/0x290 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdd/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
-> #0 (&devlink->lock_key#2){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x2c8a/0x6200 lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x550 __mutex_lock+0x12c/0x14b0 devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 mlx5e_health_report+0xc9/0xd7 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_reporter_tx_timeout+0x2ab/0x3d0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x1c1/0x280 [mlx5_core] process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1340 worker_thread+0x59d/0xec0 kthread+0x28f/0x330 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&priv->state_lock); lock(&devlink->lock_key#2); lock(&priv->state_lock); lock(&devlink->lock_key#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
4 locks held by kworker/u16:2/65: #0: ffff88811a55b138 ((wq_completion)mlx5e#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x6e2/0x1340 #1: ffff888101de7db8 ((work_completion)(&priv->tx_timeout_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x70f/0x1340 #2: ffffffff84ce8328 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x53/0x280 [mlx5_core] #3: ffff888121d20be0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x70/0x280 [mlx5_core]
stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 65 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc3_for_upstream_debug_2022_08_30_13_10 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: mlx5e mlx5e_tx_timeout_work [mlx5_core] Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d check_noncircular+0x278/0x300 ? print_circular_bug+0x460/0x460 ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x110 ? __stack_depot_save+0x24c/0x520 ? alloc_chain_hlocks+0x228/0x700 __lock_acquire+0x2c8a/0x6200 ? register_lock_class+0x1860/0x1860 ? kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 ? kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x30 ? ____kasan_slab_free+0x11d/0x1b0 ? kfree+0x1ba/0x520 ? devlink_health_do_dump.part.0+0x171/0x3a0 ? devlink_health_report+0x3d5/0x7e0 lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x550 ? devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x110 __mutex_lock+0x12c/0x14b0 ? devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 ? devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1320/0x1320 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x2d/0x100 ? bit_wait_io_timeout+0x170/0x170 ? devlink_health_do_dump.part.0+0x171/0x3a0 ? kfree+0x1ba/0x520 ? devlink_health_do_dump.part.0+0x171/0x3a0 devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 mlx5e_health_report+0xc9/0xd7 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_reporter_tx_timeout+0x2ab/0x3d0 [mlx5_core] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? mlx5e_reporter_tx_err_cqe+0x1b0/0x1b0 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_tx_reporter_timeout_dump+0x70/0x70 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_tx_reporter_dump_sq+0x320/0x320 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x70/0x280 [mlx5_core] ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1320/0x1320 ? process_one_work+0x70f/0x1340 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x1c1/0x280 [mlx5_core] process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1340 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x230/0x230 ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 worker_thread+0x59d/0xec0 ? process_one_work+0x1340/0x1340 kthread+0x28f/0x330 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 </TASK>
Fixes: c90005b5f75c ("devlink: Hold the instance lock in health callbacks") Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh moshe@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan tariqt@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed saeedm@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en.h | 1 + .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en.h index bc76fe6b06230..0ee456480a488 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en.h @@ -847,6 +847,7 @@ enum { MLX5E_STATE_DESTROYING, MLX5E_STATE_XDP_TX_ENABLED, MLX5E_STATE_XDP_ACTIVE, + MLX5E_STATE_CHANNELS_ACTIVE, };
struct mlx5e_modify_sq_param { diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c index 42e6f2fcf5f59..9910a0480f589 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c @@ -2586,6 +2586,7 @@ void mlx5e_close_channels(struct mlx5e_channels *chs) { int i;
+ ASSERT_RTNL(); if (chs->ptp) { mlx5e_ptp_close(chs->ptp); chs->ptp = NULL; @@ -2865,17 +2866,29 @@ void mlx5e_activate_priv_channels(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) if (mlx5e_is_vport_rep(priv)) mlx5e_rep_activate_channels(priv);
+ set_bit(MLX5E_STATE_CHANNELS_ACTIVE, &priv->state); + mlx5e_wait_channels_min_rx_wqes(&priv->channels);
if (priv->rx_res) mlx5e_rx_res_channels_activate(priv->rx_res, &priv->channels); }
+static void mlx5e_cancel_tx_timeout_work(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) +{ + WARN_ON_ONCE(test_bit(MLX5E_STATE_CHANNELS_ACTIVE, &priv->state)); + if (current_work() != &priv->tx_timeout_work) + cancel_work_sync(&priv->tx_timeout_work); +} + void mlx5e_deactivate_priv_channels(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) { if (priv->rx_res) mlx5e_rx_res_channels_deactivate(priv->rx_res);
+ clear_bit(MLX5E_STATE_CHANNELS_ACTIVE, &priv->state); + mlx5e_cancel_tx_timeout_work(priv); + if (mlx5e_is_vport_rep(priv)) mlx5e_rep_deactivate_channels(priv);
@@ -4617,8 +4630,17 @@ static void mlx5e_tx_timeout_work(struct work_struct *work) struct net_device *netdev = priv->netdev; int i;
- rtnl_lock(); - mutex_lock(&priv->state_lock); + /* Take rtnl_lock to ensure no change in netdev->real_num_tx_queues + * through this flow. However, channel closing flows have to wait for + * this work to finish while holding rtnl lock too. So either get the + * lock or find that channels are being closed for other reason and + * this work is not relevant anymore. + */ + while (!rtnl_trylock()) { + if (!test_bit(MLX5E_STATE_CHANNELS_ACTIVE, &priv->state)) + return; + msleep(20); + }
if (!test_bit(MLX5E_STATE_OPENED, &priv->state)) goto unlock; @@ -4637,7 +4659,6 @@ static void mlx5e_tx_timeout_work(struct work_struct *work) }
unlock: - mutex_unlock(&priv->state_lock); rtnl_unlock(); }