4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Florian Westphal fw@strlen.de
commit 95a8d19f28e6b29377a880c6264391a62e07fccc upstream.
In case nf_conntrack_tuple_taken did not find a conflicting entry check that all entries in this hash slot were tested and restart in case an entry was moved to another chain.
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com Fixes: ea781f197d6a ("netfilter: nf_conntrack: use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU and get rid of call_rcu()") Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal fw@strlen.de Acked-by: Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso pablo@netfilter.org Acked-by: Michal Kubecek mkubecek@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c @@ -719,6 +719,7 @@ nf_conntrack_tuple_taken(const struct nf * least once for the stats anyway. */ rcu_read_lock_bh(); + begin: hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(h, n, &net->ct.hash[hash], hnnode) { ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h); if (ct != ignored_conntrack && @@ -730,6 +731,12 @@ nf_conntrack_tuple_taken(const struct nf } NF_CT_STAT_INC(net, searched); } + + if (get_nulls_value(n) != hash) { + NF_CT_STAT_INC(net, search_restart); + goto begin; + } + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
return 0;