From: Ying Hsu yinghsu@chromium.org
[ Upstream commit 02c5ea5246a44d6ffde0fddebfc1d56188052976 ]
L2CAP assumes that the locks conn->chan_lock and chan->lock are acquired in the order conn->chan_lock, chan->lock to avoid potential deadlock. For example, l2sock_shutdown acquires these locks in the order: mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock) l2cap_chan_lock(chan)
However, l2cap_disconnect_req acquires chan->lock in l2cap_get_chan_by_scid first and then acquires conn->chan_lock before calling l2cap_chan_del. This means that these locks are acquired in unexpected order, which leads to potential deadlock: l2cap_chan_lock(c) mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock)
This patch releases chan->lock before acquiring the conn_chan_lock to avoid the potential deadlock.
Fixes: a2a9339e1c9d ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix use-after-free in l2cap_disconnect_{req,rsp}") Signed-off-by: Ying Hsu yinghsu@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz luiz.von.dentz@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c index b85ce276e2a3c..2f05507bb36ef 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c @@ -4659,7 +4659,9 @@ static inline int l2cap_disconnect_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
chan->ops->set_shutdown(chan);
+ l2cap_chan_unlock(chan); mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock); + l2cap_chan_lock(chan); l2cap_chan_del(chan, ECONNRESET); mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
@@ -4698,7 +4700,9 @@ static inline int l2cap_disconnect_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, return 0; }
+ l2cap_chan_unlock(chan); mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock); + l2cap_chan_lock(chan); l2cap_chan_del(chan, 0); mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);